Title: Lantern Damage Assessment Incident: The Social Psychology and Cultural Connotation Behind the Hot Discussion at Home and Abroad
Body:
In recent years, a phenomenon known as "lantern damage assessment" has gradually emerged in the mainland and has had a wide influence abroad. The so-called lantern damage assessment refers to the fact that some people record the defects of goods or food by taking photos and videos in the process of daily consumption such as shopping and dining, and then post them on social media to obtain compensation or refund. This phenomenon originated in the mainland, but it has attracted widespread attention around the world, and even triggered imitation by foreign netizens.
In foreign countries, the phenomenon of lantern damage assessment is regarded as a novel way to protect rights, and many netizens have expressed great interest in it. They are paying attention to the damage assessment actions of mainland consumers and imitating them on social media. Some foreign netizens will even understand the relevant lantern damage assessment strategies in advance when buying mainland goods, so as to escort consumption. The heated discussions and controversies caused by this phenomenon in the mainland reflect the diversity of social psychology and cultural connotations.
The foreign netizen's imitation is very in place, although he did not use a searchlight, but at least he also used a flashlight and brought the necessary tape, and the core of the imitation is that he carefully checked a plastic chair.
However, there are certain differences between the attitude of the mainland and foreign countries towards the lantern damage assessment incident. In mainland China, some people understand and agree with this phenomenon as an effective way for consumers to protect their rights, while others question it, believing that excessive rights protection may lead to a waste of social resources. In contrast, foreign netizens regard lantern damage assessment as an interesting consumption phenomenon, pay attention to and imitate it, rather than deeply explore the social psychology and cultural connotation behind it.
Looking back on the lantern damage assessment incident, we should draw reflection and enlightenment from it. First, consumers should be rational when protecting their rights and avoid excessive rights protection; secondly, businesses should strengthen after-sales service, optimize the consumption environment, and meet the reasonable needs of consumers; finally, all sectors of society should pay attention to the protection of consumer rights and interests, and jointly create a fair, just and harmonious consumption environment. Only in this way can we truly achieve mutual benefit and win-win results between consumers and businesses, and jointly promote the construction of a social credit system.