laitimes

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

author:Xiao Lei talks about his mobile phone
Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

Hello everyone, I'm Xiao Lei. Yesterday Redmi Turbo3 was released, and I personally think that this is Xiaomi's first model in 2024 that failed when it was released (combined with the starting price of 1999 yuan).

If the Xiaomi civi4pro with the same processor is at least equipped with Leica imaging to support the competition between vivo S18 pro and OPPO reno11 pro. So what does Turbo3 rely on?

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

Let's talk about the advantages first, which is also called the selling point.

The selling point can be performance, or price, or taking pictures, battery life, etc., if a mobile phone has no selling point, I will classify it as a "junk phone" category and write it into the article "Half a year of junk phone".

The biggest selling point of Redmi Turbo3 is Aoyama eye protection. Anyway, in the eye protection section, Xiaomi did try to do it, and the effect is also good, theoretically stronger than Redmi K70E.

It can even be said that if the Honor 90GT does not reduce the price, Redmi Turbo is the most eye-friendly performance machine within 2000 yuan, you ask the Honor 90?

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

The second selling point is battery life, Redmi Turbo3 with a 5000 mAh battery life can be close to the 5500 mAh OnePlus Ace3V battery life, which is still very good.

But in terms of charging, it only takes 30 minutes for the Ace3V to charge 5500 mAh with 100W, while it takes 40 minutes for the Turbo3 to charge 5000 mAh with 90W, which is a bit inefficient.

After talking about the selling points, let's talk about the cons:

Many people say that the biggest disadvantage of Redmi Turbo is the plastic back cover for 1999 yuan. Various article titles are sarcastic about the plastic back cover. But is it 20 grams lighter than the Ace3V?

The advantage of the glass back cover is that it feels good, and its thermal conductivity is also very poor, and you can't experience the good feel of adding a shell outside, so from the perspective of the back cover material, glass and plastic are only useful for the hand feel party.

The important thing about the mobile phone is the material of the middle frame (bezel), the metal frame is much stronger than the plastic frame in terms of protection, of course, the Turbo3 and Ace3V are plastic.

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

So let's talk about the real cons of the Redmi Turbo3:

"There is no positioning to speak of"

What is Turbo? This word comes from the supercharging technology on the car engine, emphasizing high performance, a mobile phone called Turbo, this tuning is actually based on performance balance, where do you come from the face called Turbo?

The Redmi Turbo3 uses the Snapdragon 8Sgen3 processor, which is of the same origin and specifications as the Snapdragon 7+ gen3 on the OnePlus Ace3V, with a higher frequency and better performance in theory.

Antutu Turbo3 ran 1.62 million points (official 1.75 million points), which is stronger than Ace3V's 1.52 million points, but the performance of the actual game, whether it is "Honor of Kings" or "Genshin Impact", the frame rate performance is weaker.

A stronger processor doesn't play games as well as a weaker processor?

Are you sure you're furious engine?

Are you sure it's not for running scores?

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

I also remember that last year, when the Redmi note12Turbo was released, the frame rate of "Genshin Impact" was above 59, and the cost performance at that time was really a human block to kill the Buddha and the Buddha to kill the Buddha, which was completely the highest enjoyment for the shy performance players in the bag.

Then the "furious engine" on the 12Turbo was suddenly gone, and then, there was no then. Well, back then it was an outlier, and now the Redmi product line is clear.

Redmi number = starter

Redmi note = overall cost performance (including photography)

Redmi K = flagship price-performance ratio

Redmi Turbo = Performance and value for money

Now Redmi Turbo's first mobile phone, Turbo 3rd generation, is not so turbo in performance. This is not a problem with the Snapdragon 8Sgen3 cache being cut, the Snapdragon 7+ gen3 cache next door is also being cut with a lower frequency, why is it better than you?

It's no longer a matter of funny names, the guy who eats is gone, how do you fight?

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

Don't tell me, "Our Turbo3 has more 2000W pixels on the front than others, the power consumption and temperature of games are lower than others, and the battery life is also good." ”

So what are you calling Turbo for? Wouldn't you just play it if you change your name to noteT? Say it's that the positioning was not clear before, so the whole "Turbo" was made, and the experience was not so Turbo, isn't this more confusing positioning?

Turbo is to play games,Aoyama eye protection is good for long-term gamingOK,Lighter 20 grams is good for long-term gaming mobile phone holding OK,And then the performance is not top tuning,Selfie 2000W What the hell???

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

And finally, this price:

Take a good look at the current price of iqoo neo8pro and Redmi K60 Ultra! Besides, Redmi K70e's 12+256G is already 1659 yuan, Turbo3 is expensive, 340 yuan, where is it expensive?

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

The performance tuning is not too fierce.

The battery life is not much stronger.

Eye protection and lightness? Okay.

2000W selfie?#@¥#...&¥%You get out of the way!!

Always remember: Turbo is supposed to be a performance phone.

Redmi Turbo 3: No performance, no price

Of course, if you are 500 yuan cheaper, I respect you as a man. Could it be that you 618 also think so?and then 16+1T is priced at 1999 yuan?