Seriously, SAIC Zhiji L6 said that it would use solid-state batteries, which caused a shock in the industry.
Because compared with traditional electrolyte batteries, solid-state batteries have too many advantages, such as increased energy density, increased safety, reduced volume, etc., which can be called subversive. Of course, many people question that it is not a true solid, and in the end it is a semi-solid state, but in general, it is also technical.
To tell the truth, Zhiji L6 technology is so good, and there is a big guy like SAIC behind it, it was originally a car that was in the limelight, I never thought that at the press conference, Zhiji L6 insisted on rubbing Xiaomi traffic, lifting Xiaomi, and smashing his own feet.
If you watch the press conference, it will be clear that at the press conference, every page of the PPT of Zhiji is playing with Xiaomi SU7. From styling to technology, to the intelligent ecology in the car and the "181cm rear space", etc., all of them are based on Xiaomi SU7.
Of course, it's nothing to fight with Xiaomi SU7, who calls Xiaomi SU7 high heat, Zhiji also wants this splashing traffic, after all, the domestic press conference, everyone is this urine, find a benchmark product, and then work hard to press the other party to the ground and rub it.
However, the problem is that when comparing Xiaomi SU7 MAX, there is a deviation in the description of the front motor of SU7, saying that Xiaomi SU7 Max is a front IGBT, and a rear Sic silicon carbide, but in fact, the front and rear are silicon carbide.
This millet can't bear it, you scold me, say ahead of me, forget it, after all, this matter can't be refuted, but you marked my parameters wrong, I have a reason to counterattack.
So Xiaomi issued a statement three times, urging Zhiji to formally apologize, and even said that it would take measures if it did not apologize, so Zhiji had to apologize three times (once as CEO, twice on official Weibo).
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with bidding against competing products, and there's nothing wrong with using competing products to highlight your advantages and attract traffic, after all, everyone does this, such as Xiaomi SU7 benchmarking Porsche Tycan, benchmarking Model3, and the same.
Therefore, there is no problem with the Zhizhi L6 benchmarking SU7 itself, but if the original intention has deviated when benchmarking, such as insisting on winning the other party, we must find out the shortcomings of the other party, and finally the action is deformed, then the mistake is inevitable.
Zhiji should be regarded as a typical example of moving Xiaomi this time, wanting to rub a wave of traffic, and finally smashing his feet, what do you think?