With its captivating plot and profound character portrayal, the Korean drama "Queen of Tears" has successfully surpassed the classic "Please Answer 1988" and become a dazzling star in tvN's ratings history.
However, with the announcement of the list of nominees for the Baeksang Arts Awards, Kim so-hyun's shortlisting is undoubtedly an affirmation of his acting skills, but Kim Ji-won's failure to be nominated has caused a public discussion about the fairness of the selection.
This article will provide an in-depth analysis of the multiple factors behind the ratings success of "Queen of Tears" and explore the complex faces of the entertainment industry revealed by the Baeksang Arts Awards nomination controversy.
The reason why the Korean drama "Queen of Tears" can stand out in the starry sky of Korean dramas is inseparable from its exquisite plot design and the affectionate performances of the actors. The enthusiastic response and high level of discussion from the audience have become a non-negligible factor in driving up the ratings.
When it comes to the success of "Queen of Tears", we have to mention the outstanding performance of the actor Kim so-hyun. His acting skills are not only a faithful interpretation of the script, but also an artistic self-transcendence, which may be the key reason why he was nominated for the Baeksang Arts Awards.
The discussion behind Kim Ji Won's non-nomination
Kim Ji Won, who is widely loved, performed a wonderful performance in "Queen of Tears", although it won unanimous praise from the audience, but it was unexpectedly not shortlisted for the Baeksang Art Awards. This phenomenon has raised questions about the selection criteria, and at the same time, there has been a critical discussion about possible gender inequality and fame preferences.
Analysis of the reasonableness of the award criteria
While digging deeper into the nomination mechanism of the Baeksang Art Awards, we discovered the complexity of the selection process and the unpredictability of the results. Unfair treatment of certain actors or subjective bias on the part of the judges can be potential factors affecting the awards. These questions make people wonder, how much do we know and supervise the fairness and standards of art awards?
The popularity of "Queen of Tears" is not just a temporary phenomenon, it may have a profound impact on the entire Korean TV drama market. From the choice of subject matter to the sophistication of production, the series has set a new benchmark in the industry and has the potential to inspire innovation and change in future productions.
At the same time, dramas may drive the development of similar themes, and even affect the adjustment of the ratings evaluation system.
The Baeksang Arts Awards nomination controversy is not only a review of "Queen of Tears", but also a profound reflection on the award system of the Korean entertainment industry. The answers to these questions need to be discussed and improved together, in order to promote the development of the entertainment industry in a healthier and more transparent direction.
Looking at the success of "Queen of Tears", it is not difficult to see the close connection between high-quality TV series and high ratings. There is also an obvious correlation between the quality of TV dramas and the recognition of awards.
Despite the controversy, Kim so-hyun's nomination does prove the dual importance of acting and the quality of the drama from one side.
Fairness and Transparency: The Expectations and Impact of the Selection Mechanism
The public has the right to know how the Baeksang Art Awards and similar awards are based and to expect the results. A fair and transparent selection is not only a sign of respect for entertainers, but also a response to the expectations of the audience.
This expectation can also promote the recognition and encouragement of excellent works inside and outside the industry, forming a virtuous circle of interaction and promoting the progress of the entire entertainment industry.