Jiangxi's "lantern damage assessment" incident has greatly affected the image of Jiangxi, and many homestays booked in advance have encountered a "wave of unsubscriptions" after this incident, which has caused the landlord to lose a lot.
The negative impact is so big, I am afraid that the landlord of "lantern damage assessment" did not expect.
The lantern damage assessment incident has just passed, and another landlord in Jinan, Shandong Province has said wildly: it is the rule that the rent will not be refunded when the deposit expires.
As soon as this remark came out, a group of netizens were stunned, if it is said that it is still making a appearance if it is not "lantern damage assessment", it is the rule that the deposit is not refunded, and it is the robbery of Chiguoguo.
What happened:
On April 7, a video of a suspected conversation between a tenant and a landlord caused heated discussions on the Internet.
In the video, the tenant wants the landlord to refund the deposit, but the landlord refuses on the grounds that the contract has not yet reached the end of the lease period.
The tenant said that I would live until May 8 (the suspected contract expired on May 8), but the landlord said that even if I lived until May 8, I would not have to return a penny, and this deposit was left by the tenant to the landlord to find the next tenant, and said that it was the rule that the deposit was not refundable.
The landlord's ugly face made the tenant extremely angry but helpless, and the tenant who had no choice but to post on the Internet asked: Is it the rule of Jinan to rent a house without returning the deposit, is this the case?
Judging from the receipts displayed by the tenants, they rented a house of 800 yuan a month, and the rent was paid on a semi-annual basis.
Judging from this receipt, the landlord should refund the tenant's deposit unconditionally if the tenant is not in arrears and the contents of the room are not damaged.
Judging from the content of the video, the landlord did not mention that the items in the house were damaged and the tenant needed to compensate for them.
Therefore, it is completely unreasonable for the landlord not to refund the deposit.
Seeing that the incident is getting bigger and bigger, there are more and more netizens who blame the landlord, and some people who claim to be the landlord's daughter say that the video is taken out of context, and things are not what everyone sees.
The landlord's daughter's explanation can be summed up in two points:
1. The tenant is in breach of contract, because the lease is not due to be surrendered, which is a breach of contract;
Second, the deposit will not be refunded until May 8, because the tenant did not greet them a month in advance and did not set aside time for them to find the next tenant, so the deposit will not be refunded.
At first glance, it seems that the tenant is vexatious, and the landlord does not return the deposit, but if you look closely at the content information in the lease contract and video, you find that she is secretly changing the concept.
First of all, the tenant in the video also said that since it has not expired, then he will live for another month, live until May 8 and then retire, and live until May 8 is not considered a breach of contract.
He said that he lived until May 8, and the deposit still had not been refunded, because the landlord moved out with a reason not to return without a month's notice.
According to the contract between the two parties, only if the tenant renews the lease, the tenant needs to notify the landlord in writing one month in advance, and the contract does not stipulate that the tenant needs to notify the landlord one month in advance for normal rent withdrawal.
Taking a step back, even if you have to give a month's notice, the tenant will not rent as early as February, which is more than a month in advance.
Therefore, this explanation of the landlord's daughter is getting darker and darker, and it is purely lifting a stone to shoot herself in the foot.
In the final analysis, even if the tenant does everything according to the landlord's requirements, he will not get the deposit in the end, because the landlord has no intention of returning it from the beginning, even if the contract is written in black and white that Party B has not breached the contract, Party A will unconditionally return the deposit to Party B on the day of the expiration of the contract.
For this kind of unreasonable landlord, the tenant has no way to take him, the money is in his hands, what can you do.
In the end, the tenant had no choice but to call the police at the suggestion of netizens, but the police couldn't handle this kind of thing, and it was recommended that the tenant sue for processing.
800 yuan is not much, but it is difficult to get back the 800 yuan.
Let's not talk about the energy cost and time cost of litigation, how many Chinese people rarely deal with the court once in their lives, go to court for this 800 yuan, and those who don't understand the law may have to hire a lawyer, the cost of rights protection is so high that many people will choose to give up, and the landlord will succeed in the end.
Just like the party involved in this matter, 500 kilometers from his hometown to Jinan, from a realistic point of view, he wants to return the deposit of 800 yuan, which is far more than the 800 yuan paid.
Some netizens were angry and gave some extreme ideas to the tenants. This method is not advisable, but it is not difficult to see the anger in the hearts of netizens.
In the comment area, there are also many netizens who empathize with the fact that it is difficult to get back the deposit even if the rent expires, even if there is no breach of contract.
It can only be said that it is too difficult to work as a worker.
Of course, not all landlords are like this, some netizens in Jinan said that they have rented a house many times and have never seen such a strange landlord.
Some netizens said that Jinan does not have this rule, and his own set has nothing to do with Jinan.
These netizens don't want to destroy the image of the entire Jinan because of this landlord.
Just now, Zhejiang Jinhua's "lantern damage assessment" came to the good news, under the mediation of the relevant departments, the ground damage non-refundable deposit has been properly resolved, and I hope that the relevant departments in other places will take active action, do not let a grain of mouse feces spoil a pot of porridge.