April 1, generally known as "April Fool's Day" in the West, has gradually been cited by the mainland in the past ten years. The original intention was to joke and engage in tricky days. However, this April Fool's Day, the Germans' faces were very unsightly. The Berlin government made a "joke" on its own bottom line, breaking the bottom line that had been insisted on for decades. Marijuana was officially legalized.
According to German media news, from April 1 this year, the German "Cannabis Act" officially came into effect, and adults in Germany can carry a certain amount of marijuana in public, or they can grow up to three marijuana plants for home consumption. In addition, it is expected that in three months, that is, from July 1, the "Cannabis Club" will also open a license to grow cannabis, but you must be a member of the club to buy it. It's equivalent to a "smoke house".
In this matter, German Health Minister Lauterbach also vigorously claimed that illegal channels will allow consumers to obtain unsafe products, open a "cannabis club", and crack down on black market and drug crimes, and ensure the safety of consumers.
At the time of 2 more Jiazi, East and West swapped roles. And the ridiculous sentence "The great powers all miss the Qing Dynasty and have become the Qing Dynasty" is actually confirmed, which is also quite interesting.
Some people may ask, is there no normal person in Germany? Why does this kind of drug have to pass, and do you like to be on par with the United States so much?
Actually, no, there are still some. Since World War II, successive German governments have been very strict in their fight against drugs. It is not for nothing that Germany can rise again from the ashes of World War II. In order to eliminate "drug crimes", drugs were directly legalized and "crimes" were solved at the root, and this routine was popular for many years. And Germany has always been an outlier in Europe. Whether it is Cole, or later Schroeder, Merkel, is very sticking to the bottom line on the drug issue.
However, this time, Scholz has been in power for 2 years, and the bottom line that has been held for decades is gone. To a large extent, on the one hand, it is based on the infiltration of Germany by the United States and there are too many proxies; on the other hand, Scholz's prestige and support are limited, so he can only solve the election problem by "seeking skin with the tiger." This has laid a hidden danger for the future. The most typical are German Foreign Minister Baerbock and Economy Minister Habeck, standard agents.
And this time, Germany was able to promote the legalization of drugs, and most of the problem actually lies in these agents. How so?
Compared with the rest of Europe, there are more "addicts" in Germany and a lot less. 4 million is equivalent to 4 million votes. That's important. The purpose of Baerbock's gang was clear: to gather as many votes and support as possible in preparation for complete control of the German regime in the future. And drugs are such a thing, everyone who understands it, once it spreads, there is almost no turning back. As long as you push hard enough, the audience will be larger and larger, and whoever supports the legalization of drugs will have more votes.
Then it led to a vicious circle, where no one dared to stand on the opposite side of the topic. Because whoever stands on the opposite side will definitely not get these 4 million votes, and the votes that will increase in the future will not be available. In addition, there is the interest here. Everyone knows how much this thing is profitable. Therefore, even though many Germans were frantically opposed, the parliamentary resolution was still passed without hindrance. At this point, Germany was completely degenerate, allowing drugs to be legalized.
For China, the impact is not great, but there is a problem that there are a handful of people in China who especially like to use the West as a benchmark, and whatever the West does, they can blow it. The West engages in "gender splitting", and these people are also secretly promoting it on domestic campuses, which we must be vigilant against.