Text: "Rural people now not only do not have to pay agricultural taxes, but also can enjoy a variety of subsidies and benefits, more importantly, they can also apply for free homesteads, but now they are not satisfied, do not know how to be grateful, and also put forward opinions to ask for pension increases, they are typical lazy people's thinking." Therefore, it is suggested that the state should stop raising the pensions of the peasants, because to give them a pension increase is a waste of money, that is, to indulge them in laziness, to indulge them in abandoning the wasteland, and to connive at them to reach out and ask for it. ”
"Now many people in the city are laid-off workers, they have neither land nor homesteads, and the cost of living in the city is very large, while the rural people basically don't have to spend money to eat, drink, and lazar, because the food they eat is from their own fields, the vegetables are grown in their own fields, and the chickens and ducks are also raised by themselves. ”
"In short, at present, rural families lack nothing, and the expenses are very small, so there is no need to raise their pensions, even if they are not given pensions, they will not be hungry, and even arouse their entrepreneurial ambitions. However, people in the city have to spend money every day when they open their eyes, and they can't live without money for a day, so the state should increase the pension for the city people, and it is best to stop the pension for the rural people, so as to subsidize the urban retirees......"
Seeing this, it is estimated that some people will be so angry that their teeth will itch, and they will even want to hit me a few times through the screen, don't get excited, don't get excited, the above is not what I said, this is a netizen's comment under a certain video. To tell the truth, I am as angry as everyone else when I see this kind of remark, I really don't know if the person who said this grew up eating peasant grain? I don't know if there are any rural people in his family for three generations? I don't know where his conscience has gone?
To be able to say such things must be extremely selfish people, who only see the peasants have cars and houses, and only see the peasants have grain and vegetables, but when the peasants have their faces to the loess and their backs to the sky, and when the beads of sweat fall to the ground in strings, they pretend not to see them. I admit that saying that peasants spend little money is pure nonsense, but that peasants don't have to spend money is pure nonsense; is it true that peasants don't need to spend money to grow land and vegetables? Do peasants don't need money to raise chickens and ducks? Are these things flying into the peasants' bowls by themselves?
During the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression in the past, when our country was most dangerous, who stood up and sacrificed his life to drive out the aggressors? When foreign countries forced the mainland to pay off its foreign debts, who took the initiative to help solve the problem? During the natural disasters of several years, who pulled out grain from between his teeth and saved countless people? And who paid public grain and volunteered for a long time to support national construction? I believe that I don't need to say that everyone knows very well that all this is silently borne by the old peasants.
However, now that the peasants have just lived a good life, some people are not happy. What is the difference between this and a white-eyed wolf? They say that peasants can eat whatever they want when they have grain and can eat as many chickens and ducks as they want, but do they know that they need to buy seeds, pesticides, and fertilizers to grow grain? Do they know that raising chickens and ducks still needs to buy fodder and raise them for several months? Now that the prices of agricultural products are so low, peasants cannot make money at all from farming, and they also have to rely on the weather for food, and once they encounter a drought or flood, it is very easy to lose their harvest?
Who cares about the income that peasants have earned after a year of hard work is not as good as a month's salary for a city dweller? Who cares about the fact that a city dweller has a barbecue that is higher than a month's subsidy for an old peasant? Who cares about the peasants who have never had a holiday or have never been able to commute to and from work on time? Who can understand the feeling of a peasant who has earned a lifetime of hard work and "returns to the pre-liberation period overnight" after being hospitalized for a few days? The peasants see that everyone else has a high pension and that everyone else can enjoy the "deemed contributions" Who can understand the feeling of loss in the face of such unfair treatment?
I believe that everyone also knows that if it were not for our peasants' hard work in growing grain and producing agricultural products, what would the rich people eat and drink? If there were no peasants, would they have a happy life today? However, there are some people who have just lived in the city for a few years and have only lived a good life for a few days and look down on the peasants.
The peasants have paid so much for the country in the past, but in the end, who is not left with a sickness? Not to mention being hospitalized with injections, they are reluctant to take some medicine to eat, because the pension of more than 100 yuan a month is simply not enough to spend, but even so, some people still say that the peasants do not need to spend money and should not raise their pensions.
After all, they have made great contributions, after all, they have made great sacrifices for the development of the country, after all, they have indeed been treated differently, and they have not enjoyed the benefits they deserve, after all, most of them are still living very hard, and they can only rely on more than 100 yuan pensions every month to live......
Is it wrong for the rural people to speak out and hope to raise their pensions? Isn't this human nature? Some people can go to Beijing to petition for the issue of pension increases, but why can't the peasants put forward their opinions? The rural people's opinions do not hurt anyone, and what is moreover, this is also to win the light for everyone, and the light they have won can still shine on everyone, so why do people always stop the peasants from speaking out?
Conclusion: The above is all the content I want to share with you today, there is still a lot to say, but these topics are too sensitive, and it is not easy to pass the review if you say too much, so I can only talk about it here, and I will continue to talk about this topic when I have the opportunity in the future, so stay tuned. Okay, that's it, finally I implore you to help with one-click triple support, thank you, we'll see you next time!