laitimes

The media expressed: for a long time in the future, there is still a need to exist

Nowadays, all kinds of "legends" about property companies in the community can be said to be surging, and there are some "good stories" that make people laugh and cry. Some people say that the property management company is the "invisible boss" in the community, quietly collecting all kinds of fees, and some people say that the property management company is like a "chronic" waiter, always slow to solve the owner's problems. In short, the various slots about the property company seem to have become a "big problem" for many residents in the community.

The media expressed: for a long time in the future, there is still a need to exist

However, having said that, the existence of property companies is not useless. They shoulder the important responsibility of maintaining the community environment and ensuring the safety of the owners, and to a certain extent, they can also be regarded as the "guardians" of the community. However, in recent years, with the exposure of problems such as poor service quality and arbitrary charges of some property companies, the call for the abolition of property management companies has become more and more loud. So, should the property company cancel it? This question is not so simple.

I have to admit that there are indeed many problems in property management companies. Some property management companies are not transparent in their charges, which makes the owners confused; some property management companies have a poor service attitude and turn a deaf ear to the demands of the owners; and some property management companies even have the problem of corruption and fill the owners' own pockets. These problems not only damage the interests of the owners, but also seriously affect the image and reputation of the property company.

These issues do not mean that the property company cannot be abolished as a blanket request. After all, property companies still play an irreplaceable role in community management. They are responsible for the greening, cleaning, security and other work of the community, providing a relatively comfortable and safe living environment for the owners. If there is no property management company, who should take care of these tasks? Should the owners take matters into their own hands and set up a "community management committee" to be responsible for these things? Although it sounds funny, it is indeed a question worth considering.

The media expressed: for a long time in the future, there is still a need to exist

Nor can we turn a blind eye to the problems of the strata company. In order to solve these problems, we must first work on the system. The government should strengthen the supervision of property management companies, formulate stricter rules and regulations, and regulate the behavior of property management companies. At the same time, an effective complaint and reporting mechanism should also be established, so that owners can have channels to report problems and protect their rights and interests.

In addition, property companies themselves should also strengthen internal management and improve service quality. They should strengthen the training and education of employees, and improve the service awareness and professionalism of employees. At the same time, we should also strengthen communication and exchanges with the owners, keep abreast of the needs and opinions of the owners, and continuously improve their work.

Some people may say that this property company is like a "stubborn disease" in the community, which is always difficult to cure. But I would like to say that in fact, the property company is more like a mirror, reflecting some problems and contradictions in our society. We should not blindly complain and blame, but should understand and solve these problems with our hearts. Only in this way can we make the "stubborn disease" of the property company less difficult and make the life of the community better.

Besides, if the property management company is really abolished, then who should take care of the trivial matters in the community? Do we really have to rely on us "amateurs" to support the whole community? I feel a bit of a headache when I think about it. So, let's give the property company a chance to reflect and improve, and strive to provide us with better services.

The media expressed: for a long time in the future, there is still a need to exist

In addition, we should actively pay attention to and actively participate in jointly promoting the reform and progress of property companies. Only in this way can we truly realize the democratization and scientificization of community management and make our lives better.

In this process, the government, owners' committees, property management companies and other parties should play their roles and form a joint force. The government should strengthen supervision and guidance to provide strong support and guarantee for the development of property management companies; owners' committees should strengthen communication and contact with property owners, keep abreast of the needs and opinions of property owners, and provide a strong reference for the improvement of property management companies; while property management companies should strengthen their own construction, improve service quality and management level, and win the trust and support of property owners.

There are also some innovative ways we can improve the services of property companies. For example, the Internet and big data and other technical means can be used to establish a smart property management system to improve management efficiency and service quality, and a third-party evaluation agency can also be introduced to objectively evaluate and supervise the services of the property company and promote the continuous improvement of the property company.

In short, as an important part of community management, the existence of property companies is necessary. After all, some central media once expressed its position in 30 words: "Until a better alternative service is found, property still has its value and necessity". This also means that at least for a long time in the future, there is still a need for property management companies to exist.

Therefore, we should look at the problems of property companies with an open, inclusive and rational attitude, and promote the reform and progress of property companies by strengthening supervision and improving service quality. I believe that in the near future, we will be able to enjoy more high-quality, efficient and convenient property services, so that our lives will be better.