Recently, the term "illegal fishing" has become hot again, and this entertainment method for ordinary people will face a huge dilemma. According to officials from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, fishing may adopt a filing system in the future, but in fact, to put it bluntly, it is two words "license". In other words, as long as you spend money to get a license, you are legal to fish, and if you don't have a license, of course you are illegal. This statement has just appeared, and not only has it once again been strongly opposed by fishing friends across the country, but even many ordinary people have expressed their incomprehension: Why do some issues involving ordinary people have to rise to the level of laws and regulations? Why do these experts like to work against the common people?
Fishing as a traditional way of entertainment in the mainland, has continued for thousands of years, there is a legend of Jiang Taigong fishing in history, of course, there is also a famous sentence of "lonely boat, fishing alone in the cold river and snow". In fact, fishing is another major entertainment activity for many people in addition to running and fitness, which can not only cultivate the mind, but also reduce the burden of work and life, and promote social consumption. Fishing competitions and fishing tackle exhibitions held throughout the country every year can promote local social and economic development. But despite this, this traditional pastime has been criticized in various ways. According to experts, there are three major harms to fishing: First, littering garbage is easy to cause pollution; second, the pursuit of aquatic products can easily lead to a great threat to the survival of fish; third, perennial fishing is easy to lead to family problems. I really want to say that these experts are really heartbroken, and he has helped others think about what they should and shouldn't. But is that really the case? Not necessarily.
First, let's take a look at whether fishing will pollute the environment. It is undeniable that individual anglers litter and the ingredients in the bait may cause pollution to the environment to a certain extent. But did we think that even if there were no anglers, would our environment be better because of this? As we all know, the main cause of water pollution comes from industrial pollution, some industrial sewage, industrial waste and industrial waste, and all kinds of toxic and harmful gases flow into the rivers with rainwater, which is the main source of water pollution. I've never seen a place where fishing has caused significant pollution to the environment, so this argument is untenable. In addition, most of the current anglers are more particular about various propaganda, some will collect and dispose of their own garbage, and many people take the initiative to clean up the local garbage, just to create a better fishing environment, so it seems that the claim that fishing will cause pollution is simply untenable.
Second, the argument that excessive pursuit of catch threatens the survival of fish is even more. Of course, due to the increase in the pressure of survival in modern society, more and more people have joined the fishing army, so some experts have calculated that a person fishes 2 catties a day, and 1000 people are 2000 catties, and this situation repeats every day, and it is easy to catch all the local fish. I listened to this expert's inferences and simply left me speechless. At first glance, this expert has never fished, or has no knowledge of the actual situation of anglers across the country. In fact, everyone knows that at present, except for professional fishermen, basically no one will make a living from the catch, most anglers want to have fun, and a considerable number of people release the fish after fishing, they don't care about the amount of fish at all. There are also some anglers who choose to keep the big ones and let them go small, and only a very few people will keep them both big and small. Not only that, in fact, most people have the majority of the air force in a day, and very few can catch more than 2 catties, so it is unlikely to have a major impact on the ecological environment.
If we talk about the factors that have a significant impact on ecological resources and aquatic products, the main situation is still industrial pollution. Of course, some illegal electric fish, medicine fish and some behaviors prohibited by current laws will also have a certain impact on the survival of fish. On the contrary, most anglers are also very disgusted by these behaviors, and through fishing, they can effectively monitor such illegal behaviors, thus making their own contribution to the maintenance of ecological fishing resources. Therefore, if fishing will threaten the fish population and have a serious impact on ecological and environmental resources, this is simply nonsense, and it is really a crime to add to it.
Again, experts actually say that because fishing can affect family feelings. This is really in place, and it is ridiculous. Everyone knows very well that in today's highly competitive environment, being able to maintain a relaxed mood can further promote family harmony. After a hard day's work, the fisherman can bring back a little catch to the family, which can not only make the person concerned physically and mentally happy, but also add a touch of fun to the family. What our experts need to pay attention to is how to ensure people's livelihood, how to promote social employment, how to improve the lives of ordinary people, how to ensure social fairness and justice, and how to enhance the overall strength of the country. Instead of keeping an eye on some people's money bags, on the people's land, and on the people's only few ways of entertainment.
Let's take a look at life, the electric vehicles that are related to the people's life and travel are also stared at by some experts; the land and homesteads related to the survival of farmers are always remembered by some experts; and the various lifestyles related to the people's livelihood are also banned and restricted for various reasons. Isn't the life of the common people difficult enough? In such a difficult environment, they want to go fishing and relax, but as a result, all kinds of controversies have arisen. In fact, to put it bluntly, what kind of case is prepared, isn't it just for everyone to spend money to get a certificate? Isn't it just for their own little interests? Or maybe it's just to be in line with international standards, because Western countries also do this. I sincerely hope that our relevant departments will conscientiously devote more efforts and use their brains to the people's livelihood and well-being; I also hope that the relevant experts can conduct more research and research on some capital groups to see how to solve the problem of deformed high salaries, how to solve the problem of corruption in the lives of elite groups, how to solve the problem of excessive gap between the rich and the poor in society, how to solve the problem of promoting employment and ensuring the development of the country's economic construction, and how to spare the common people.