Isn't this an obvious black shop? A few children bought freshly knitted bracelets, but the store charged more than 2,000 yuan.
Loading...
It is understood that the three children were not accompanied by their parents in the store at that time, but the clerk just knitted bracelets for them, and after the bracelets were braided, they directly said that they would cost more than 2,000 yuan.
Such a young child, how did he know that a few bracelets would be so expensive, and how could he come up with so much money, I believe the clerk must be very clear about this, but he did not ask the child's parents where they were first, but after the bracelet was finished, he directly said that it would cost more than 2,000 yuan, and finally it was paid by another woman.
Loading...
After paying the money, they called the parents of one of the children, after learning about it, the parents were very angry, she realized that the child was cheated, so she immediately found the store staff theory, asked the other party in advance whether the price had been told to the child in advance, and asked the other party to return the money.
In the face of the child's mother's inquiry, although the clerk said that he had told the price, his tone was a little weak, saying that "the prices are all there", and then said that they could refund some of them, but even if they didn't refund one, you couldn't do anything.
Although the clerk said that she could refund some of them, the parents were still not satisfied, because the store was obviously cheating people, so she called the police, but even if the police came, the merchant still insisted on not refunding the full amount, on the grounds that it took two hours for the clerk to weave the bracelet and could not be refunded in full.
After this incident was exposed, it quickly attracted the attention of the majority of netizens, and netizens also discussed it. Some people think that the woman who paid in place of the shop was in the same league as the shop, otherwise who would help someone pay for no reason?
The little expression of the woman who paid for it knows
Don't guess, the one who pays for the child is full of routines with the merchant
Do parents agree? If not, then pay on behalf of the child
This is all a liar, I used to be in the mall agate name bracelet, all of them were scams, say a few dollars a piece, and then make up the time to let you fill in two beads, it's hundreds!
Minors, incapacitated for civil conduct. The transaction is not valid
If a minor buys something beyond the age range, it must be recognized by the guardian, and he can sue for a lawsuit.
According to the relevant law, the child's purchase is inconsistent with his cognitive ability, and its validity is pending. In other words, parents have every right to choose whether to recognize or refuse. The statement that the merchant said that "no refund" is actually untenable in law.
This incident has also reminded parents that they must strengthen the education and management of their children to avoid similar things from happening again. At the same time, it is also hoped that the relevant departments can strengthen market supervision, and must crack down on the illegal behavior of merchants to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.