Let's talk about the leaders of state-owned enterprises. Imagine a 43-year-old leader who is handsome and good at dealing with people. His business ability is not good, but he knows how to deal with people. We are often invited to drink milk tea or eat to make everyone feel super comfortable. Every time the company pays benefits, our office can always share the benefits it deserves. What is even more admirable is that he has a very good temper.
Once, I was a little drunk because I had drunk too much, "bluntly said in front of him that his business ability was too poor, how did he become a leader?" and also mentioned that he should not interfere too much in our affairs. I said that as long as we completed the tasks assigned by our superiors, he only needed to be responsible for the logistics. "I insulted my immediate boss in public, challenged his authority, and questioned his business ability. But he didn't wear small shoes for me, because he was highly professional and well-cultivated
This kind of leadership is useful in any unit, the people below can unite, and the key is to fight for the interests of the department, which is what the core of a department should do. It is good for state-owned enterprises to meet such leaders if they can face up to their own business, manage the team well, and think about their subordinates. How many businesses are not good and blindly command the scourge of everyone, only for the sake of the leader, the people below are slaves, the results are his, and the subordinates are responsible for the problems.