Britain used to be an "empire on which the sun never sets", but now Britain has even entered India in terms of economic scale, and although Britain is declining, British politicians are still living in the dream of empire, for which there are all kinds of astonishing rhetoric. Britain began to rely on the United States after World War II, thus becoming a hardcore follower of the United States, and recently Britain joined the United States in the United States launched an air campaign against the Houthis in Yemen, according to the announcement issued by the United States Central Command, the United States and the United Kingdom launched another air strike on the Houthis in Yemen on February 3, during which more than 30 targets were destroyed. Since January 12, the United States and the United Kingdom have repeatedly joined forces to fight the Houthis in Yemen, highlighting the collusion between the United States and the United Kingdom.
While the United Kingdom joined the United States in the Houthi strike in Yemen, it also played a very disgraceful role during the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, and the United Kingdom has repeatedly increased the level of military aid to Ukraine, the most obvious being that the United Kingdom took the lead in providing Ukraine with Storm Shadow cruise missiles, so that Ukraine has a long-range strike capability, and under the leadership of the United Kingdom, France also announced that it would provide Ukraine with Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Also because of the repeated breakthroughs of the United Kingdom, the United States also agreed to provide Ukraine with tactical surface-to-surface missiles for the M142 Seahorse, so that Ukraine can strike targets in Crimea.
According to Russian media reports, British officials have encouraged NATO to directly join the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and Russian media claimed that Britain proposed that NATO use troops to enter Ukraine and establish a so-called "no-fly zone" for Ukraine, while also encouraging NATO to strike at important parent targets in northern Russia. The proposal put forward by the United Kingdom immediately attracted the attention of the outside world, so it seems that Britain is bold enough, because it is betting on the rhythm of Russia not daring to use nuclear weapons. Russia has long said that if Russia and its allies are attacked by missiles, Russia will not hesitate to use nuclear weapons to retaliate.
If NATO were to fight Russia directly, Russia would use nuclear weapons, because NATO would not just fight with infantry, and British officials have suggested that NATO launch direct attacks on Russian targets, highlighting Britain's malicious intent. During the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Britain continued to arch the fire, because Britain is far away from the European continent, so the impact of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on Britain is much smaller than the impact on the European continent, so Britain continues to jump up and down, so as to actively cooperate with the United States to seize benefits from Europe. Now Britain is encouraging NATO to go to war directly with Russia, and it is obvious that Britain is overestimating its own wisdom.
In fact, British officials have warned the PLA about the rhythm of NATO's direct participation in the war, because one of NATO's goals in supporting Ukraine is to prevent the PLA from taking over Taiwan by force. When NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg visited the United States, he made public NATO's position, declaring that the United States and NATO support Ukraine in order to prevent the PLA from reunifying Taiwan by force, and for this reason called on the US Congress to immediately approve military aid to Ukraine. NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg personally came to the door to ask for an explanation after the United States stopped military aid to Ukraine, but the US Congress did not give a specific conclusion, because now that the United States has entered an election year, all actions are to serve the election.