There is such a message in the comment area of my article "Yu Hua swears in front of the media to praise Mo Yan, is it true temperament, or is it the externalization of vulgar thinking?":
It seems that this netizen named "Dahai" is also unimpressed with Yu Hua's "style of speech". The "Yu Da Poet" he mentioned at the end is Yu Xiuhua, who has one more word than Yu Hua, and both of them actually have a penchant for foul language, just like brothers and sisters!
Yu Xiuhua was silent for a long time after the end of the relationship, but she didn't expect a big foul sentence to make Yu Da poet successfully return to people's field of vision.
I am not interested in Yu Da Poet, because I am one of the members of the public who was satirized by the great poet Zhao Lihua that "the public does not understand modern poetry", and I do not understand Yu Xiuhua's sleeping poems. But I am interested in the effect of Yu Da's poet's foul language.
Jianghai poet Zhang Xiaoben asked with "Who provoked her again?", and was angry at Fengyang Xuanzi for causing trouble. However, the big rough mouth of the poet Yu Da was "transformed" into a sensitive word.
Then he focused on the crusade against Fengyang Xuanzi's boasted "two million words of literary works". And the comment on Fengyang Juezi angering Yu Xiuhua was not mentioned.
Although the posted picture frames this comment in red, it is more like a reminder to look at Yu Xiuhua's big foul language below. Pay attention to the number of people who like Yu Xiuhua's rude language, which has an absolute advantage over the comments in the red box.
From this point of view, isn't the previous "transformation" a "face-saving project"? Posting other people's more unbearable messages is more like trying to cover it up? Who can understand the style of Jianghai poets?
What I can't understand is the operation of the Jianghai poet, even "don't look at incivility, don't listen to incivility, don't speak incivility, don't move incivility", and don't pass on incivility, and transformed into a rural long-tongued woman despised by civilized people. In fact, even the rural long-tongued woman is not as good. Rural long-tongued women also have their own moral standards, and what they preach is what they criticize. The reason why they are annoying is because of the limitations of their realm, and they have been reduced to the point of causing trouble and making people annoying.
Jianghai poets should have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, and they can meet the consequences of spreading big foul mouths, but they still spread it. Moreover, the Jianghai poet did not make any accusations against Yu Xiuhua, but helped Yu Xiuhua ridicule the "two million words of literary works" - what the hell?
The headline author "Stupid Ballet" (Zhang Xiaoben's "stupid") moved Yu Xiuhua's big mouth to the headlines from the WeChat public account "Chunshui Stone Wearing". Looking at the number of likes of the big rough mouth, it still has an absolute advantage compared with the number of likes of Fengyang Juezi's comments.
ridiculed Fengyang Juezi: "I wanted to rub Yu Xiuhua's traffic, but I unexpectedly humiliated myself." He claimed to have been in a group with Fengyang Juezi, and his literary quality was extremely poor. shows that she is also a literati.
What is intriguing is that neither Jianghai poets nor stupid Paris, nor did they express their opinions on the criticism of Yu Xiuhua.
Writing the word "fart" into poetry and "sex" into poetry is the characteristic of Yu Da poets. Poetry was originally the crown jewel of literature, and when you write like this, you will spoil poetry.
Is there anything wrong with this passage? Didn't Yu Xiuhua become popular by sleeping poems? Isn't Yu Xiuhua's big foul language very revealing?
However, there is a saying in Stupid Paris that is right - "The current literary world is not as good as the vegetable market, full of mud and sand, mixed with fish and dragons, and more unbearable than officialdom." ”
Yu Xiuhua's coarse mouth was praised by the overwhelming majority of people, which cannot but be said to be the sadness of the times, and the writers criticized Fengyang Xuanzi one after another and expressed their solidarity with Yu Xiuhua, exposing the overall quality of Chinese writers, and embarrassingly placing Yu Hua and Yu Xiuhua in a deaf ear to the Chinese Writers' Association.