#妙笔生花创作挑战#
After meeting with Wang Yi, member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and foreign minister, in Bangkok, Thailand, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan returned to Washington and again openly talked about Sino-US relations.
At the same time, Sullivan also said that the United States will continue to work to strengthen the construction of a communication mechanism between China and the United States to continue to deepen the construction of communication mechanisms to reduce the possibility of conflict. In the future, the United States will continue to engage in dialogue with China on climate, health, security, economy, and artificial intelligence, and will also have in-depth communication on the Red Sea crisis and the Korean Peninsula.
Sullivan believes that China will definitely become a participant and competitor on the world stage in the future, and the United States will need China's participation more in more international issues in the future. But at the same time, China will also compete directly with the United States. So the most important thing for both China and the United States is to find a way to coexist, not only for the benefit of China and the United States, but also for the benefit of the world.
Wang Yi met with Sullivan
Interestingly, to demonstrate the importance of this statement, Sullivan also made a point of emphasizing that China and the United States have already achieved results on the issue of "crisis prevention." For example, in the recent elections in the Taiwan region, both China and the United States maintained the greatest restraint, and there were no incidents in the Taiwan Strait that could change the geopolitical balance.
Before the start of the Taiwan regional election, Liu Jianchao, director of the International Liaison Department of the CPC Central Committee, was invited to visit the United States, and China and the United States have had frequent contacts and communication in the economic, military, and other fields. This is not only an example of the easing of relations between China and the United States, but also a means for China and the United States to manage the conflict.
It is precisely because of this frequent communication between the two countries that the Taiwan regional election has not become the flashpoint of the next round of Taiwan Strait crisis. But I still say that Sino-US relations will not be static, and although relations have improved at present, confrontation is the main trend in general. Even Sullivan stressed that Sino-US relations cannot continue to develop according to the trend of relaxation, and the Taiwan Strait crisis is still the "biggest risk" in Sino-US relations.
Sullivan
Therefore, on this issue, Sullivan said that the United States must take measures, such as deterrence and strong diplomatic capabilities of the United States, to deal with possible future crises in the Taiwan Strait.
Therefore, in Sino-US relations, Sullivan's statement is a typical "stand and stand". In fact, on the issue of so-called Sino-US cooperation, the biggest purpose of Sullivan's visit to Bangkok was the Red Sea crisis, and the United States hopes to pull China into intervention and exert its so-called "influence" on Iran to help the United States solve its problems.
At present, the United States can neither fight the Houthis in a big way, but it cannot ignore them, but the situation in which the US air strikes do not have much impact on the Houthis, but on the contrary, they have worsened the situation in the Red Sea, and the Houthi attacks against the United States and the West have been further strengthened. As a result, the United States is currently very embarrassed.
U.S.-China relations
Over the past month, the United States has been hyping up China's so-called "influence" over Iran and the Houthis in an attempt to pressure China to stop the Houthis from carrying out any more attacks on passing merchant ships.
However, even as it has a request from others, the United States has not stopped on the Taiwan Strait issue, vainly trying to play the "Taiwan card" to pressure us to compromise. For example, a delegation of U.S. lawmakers "visited Taiwan" and a U.S. destroyer passed through the Taiwan Strait to practice so-called "freedom of navigation." In addition, Rosenberg, chairman of the "American Institute in Taiwan," once again dished out the so-called "theory that Taiwan's status is undecided" and sent a wrong signal to the "Taiwan independence" forces on the island.
This series of actions by the United States has directly led to the escalation of the situation in the Taiwan Strait, and correspondingly, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) has launched a new round of combat readiness patrols around the island and said that it will normalize exercises and training around Taiwan.
In addition, we need to pay attention to the fact that the United States is really capable of achieving the so-called "deterrence of China"? This answer is obviously no. Recently, three US aircraft carriers have been dispatched to the Asia-Pacific region, and there are views on the island that this is to strengthen the mainland's "deterrence" capability.
Obviously, however, this is nothing more than an illusion and self-paralysis on the part of some people on the island, because these three aircraft carriers are heading for the situation in Northeast Asia. The situation on the Korean Peninsula has been in a tense state since the new round of mutual shelling, and the DPRK and the ROK have made harsh remarks against each other, and the clouds of war have loomed over the peninsula. Moreover, if the US military really wants to engage in the so-called "deterrence strategy" and only use three aircraft carriers, it will be just a food delivery.
Gone are the days when the United States could "deter" us with just a few aircraft carriers in the Taiwan Strait, after China's military capabilities have made great strides. Today's PLA has developed a complete "area denial" capability. For example, the Dongfeng-21D and Dongfeng-26 series of anti-ship ballistic missiles have an effective range of more than 2,000 kilometers, and as long as the United States dares to intervene in the Taiwan Strait issue, then US military bases and aircraft carriers and other surface ships within 2,000 to 4,000 kilometers of China will be hit by ballistic missiles and it will be difficult for them to survive. In this case, the United States will not be able to deter us, let alone 3 aircraft carrier battle groups, even with more aircraft carriers.
Therefore, Sullivan's call to strengthen the so-called "deterrence" capability on the Taiwan issue may not be for us at all, but for the radical forces in the United States and to cheer up the "Taiwan independence" forces of the Democratic Progressive Party on the island.