laitimes

There is no basis for saying (playing the name of a person in the Yuan Dynasty)

author:Sixiang.com's original brain teaser
There is no basis for saying (playing the name of a person in the Yuan Dynasty)
There is no basis for saying (playing the name of a person in the Yuan Dynasty)
There is no basis for saying (playing the name of a person in the Yuan Dynasty)

  The Lantern Festival has passed, and I believe everyone has guessed a lot of riddles. 315 is a day of anti-counterfeiting, and it has passed. Here, Sixiang wants to expose some false and wrong riddles in the riddles, please correct them.

  If you look up the riddle on the Internet, you will find that the riddle of many websites is "unbelievable". Some websites explain that the word "white" means "to say". "Verbal unfounded" means that there is no real evidence to say (white) words, which is not enough to make people believe, and "white does not believe".

  The original explanation of this riddle is questionable. This riddle is wrong to understand "faith" as "to believe." One of the explanations of the word "letter" in the dictionary: credential, credential. In this way, "reliance" deducts "faith", and "faith" here means "credential", not to believe.

  Here, Sixiang tries to explain this riddle, but it's not necessarily right.

  Guess this riddle may use the split deduction method.

  "Mouth" buckle white, both have the meaning of speaking.

  No buckles, no.

  Both have the meaning of "credential".

  In this way, the answer to the riddle is "white unbelief".

  In this way, after analysis, we know that the original explanation of this riddle is indeed inaccurate.

Read on