1. Who loses and who wins?
On the evening of January 23, Sima Nan suddenly posted on social media:
Is the cute old Hu the big man who cooks the cakes?
How do you turn Hu Da Cooker back and forth?
Obviously, he is talking about another big V, Hu Xijin.
Sima Nan was also a loss, openly comparing Lao Hu to "Wu Dalang", sarcastically rebellious and repeatedly jumping sideways.
Because Hu Xijin said that "if the stock market falls to 2,800 points, I will jump off the building and so on", but later slapped himself in the face.
But who is Lao Hu?
A wonderful pen points to the country, and an embroidered tongue is a lotus.
Can he take it?
immediately posted a counterattack:
Lao Hu was also unceremonious, directly hitting Sima Nan's sore spot:
I suggested that he sell the house in the United States and switch to the Chinese stock market together.
I also said something very interesting:
I won't take the initiative to persuade any shareholder to buy stocks at this time, but Sima Nan is an old friend, and I am willing to encourage him!
In other words, Lao Hu is bad enough, knowing that the "small house" is Sima Nan's weakness, he will fight here as soon as he comes up!
He actually persuaded Sima Nan to sell the house and speculate in stocks?
is still a "I don't tell ordinary people" style, it turns out that cultural people treat old friends like this?
This is a pit to death!
2. Netizens are hotly discussed, and most of them support Sima Nan
This incident quickly aroused heated discussions among netizens.
Interestingly, the comment area almost overwhelmingly supports Sima Nan!
Sima Nan has faced life and death many times, but Lao Hu doesn't even dare to deal with the challenge of a scholar, who are the real masters?
Hu Xijin doesn't have a house, does he have dollars?
It stands to reason that the same big V with more than 10 million fans, both of them should have a lot of supporters, and when they quarrel, they should also have their own supporters. But public opinion is almost one-sided!
Why?
I think it might be like this:
Although Sima Nan was "morally flawed," his views, words and deeds were firm and consistent.
But Hu Xijin is not. Lao Hu is most famous, that is, today Hu Xi enters, tomorrow Hu Xi retreats, which way the wind blows, which way he falls. It caused a lot of disgust.
Let's put it this way, most of the critics of Sima Nan are critics of his views. Most of those who criticize Hu Xijin criticize him as a person.
In this case, such an outcome seems to be expected.
There is another detail that I don't know if you have noticed:
Sima Nan posted a post at 10:51 p.m. on January 23.
Hu Xijin responded, it was 10:57 p.m. on January 23!
In other words, in just 6 minutes, Lao Hu completed a series of actions such as "discovering the enemy's situation, deciding on actions, conceiving wording, and issuing a response"!
It's so late, and it's still so fast!
The speed of action, the vigor of the hands, and the vigor of the energy are especially better than the 20-year-old youth!
As we all know, Lao Hu was a former soldier, and I seriously doubt that he was a scout back then!
3. The two scolded each other more than once
In fact, this is not the first time that the two have scolded each other in the air.
Previously, Hu Xijin mentioned "America's small house" many times in his post, which connotates Sima Nan.
Sima Nan also responded to this:
Unexpectedly, as soon as Sima Nan made a move this time, he was exposed again!
It seems that there is no difference to arguing with ordinary people "how are you on such and such a day".
It seems that celebrities are also ordinary people!
4. After reading the lively thoughts
So Sima Nan and Hu Xijin, who is justified? Who do you support more?
It doesn't really matter.
In my opinion, the fact that Sima Nan has a house in the United States does not affect whether his views are correct or not.
Lao Hu has repeatedly jumped sideways many times, which does not mean that what he says next time is worthless.
In the final analysis, we need to learn to "take matters as they are" instead of pointing to their mistakes and denying them entirely.
Saints also have mistakes, and a murderer does not mean that he does not have the right time, the good time.
It's fun to watch, but what's the gain from watching it? This is a place worth thinking about for each of us.