Text: Xie Zhichuan
It is really too lenient, and 19 countries have put forward proposals on whether Hong Kong's implementation of the National Security Law violates human rights, and asked Hong Kong to improve. Strangely, Hong Kong is not the land of these people, so why should they point fingers? And the countries that proposed the proposals have not very good human rights records of their own. In particular, those Western countries like to talk about human rights, and you are like the United States, which exalts human rights at every turn.
What should the United States do to solve racial discrimination? A white police officer in the United States presses a black prisoner with his knee and suffocates people alive, or a white police officer shoots a black man when he sees him, and he just takes a driver's license and says that he seems to have a gun. Has the United States solved the problem of racial discrimination, does not every race have its own human rights, and are those black people not citizens of the United States?
Citizens have the rights of citizens, and citizens have the human rights of citizens, so please ask the Americans to take care of themselves first and not talk about human rights all day long. Hong Kong was so chaotic before, wasn't it also deliberately mixed in by Western countries? Encouraging those young people to take to the streets, the same thing is happening in London, it's happening in Paris, it's happening in Washington, D.C., what are you going to do in these countries, won't you take coercive measures? Surely, the same thing is happening in Tokyo, it's happening in Seoul, won't the riot police come out? What's more, when Hong Kong was dealing with it at that time, the Hong Kong police were already merciful, and many people were injured, and they let these affected young people play with them casually, only in the end did they know that they had been deceived.
How good is your human rights record, the British? Didn't you deceive a bunch of Hong Kong people by holding a passport issued by Hong Kong, and it is not a passport of a Hong Kong citizen. After they went, many people scolded the British for being ungrateful and deceived them into coming to England. As a result, they have no job and can only live on the streets, so do these people have no human rights? Therefore, those who exalt human rights usually have a bad record of human rights. Today, even if you are not a citizen of the United States, as long as you have a different skin color, don't you suffer racial discrimination when you go to the United States to buy things?
When I was in England, I was also stoned by their children, and their racial discrimination was also very serious, so did the British solve the problem of racial discrimination? Nothing has been solved, and now even the problem of race in France has come to the fore, have the French solved the problem of racial discrimination, have the Germans solved the problem of human rights, and have they solved the problem of human rights for refugees? So before you point fingers at others about human rights issues, don't forget that you point one finger at someone else, and four fingers at yourself.
I haven't handled my own affairs yet, and I point fingers at Hong Kong affairs all day long. After the implementation of the "National Security Law" in Hong Kong, has the entire social order been restored, and has Hong Kong's daily life also returned to normal? Those who criticize Hong Kong have ulterior motives, and those who accuse Hong Kong of being an international financial center have lost some wealth as a result of this disaster? Because they are the ones who are the initiators, they have undermined Hong Kong's stability and peace, and created turmoil in Hong Kong to contain the mainland. Sima Zhao's heart is well known to passers-by.
These Western countries are the real shame, and if you want to make such human rights accusations in the future, please first manage your own human rights record, and don't look at others with your own standards and colored glasses. What about human rights, the United States claims to have human rights, how many people live on the streets, is this what a world power should have? How many homeless people are also living on the streets, and where is the US Government's care for them, then where are their human rights?
These Western democracies, led by the United States, should take a look at their own countries' human rights records before talking about human rights. How good is it done, and what qualifications do you have to accuse others. Isn't Hong Kong now also slowly recovering, and if it weren't for that turmoil, would Hong Kong have fallen to this point? Aren't all these disasters created by these people who flaunt human rights, so please take care of yourself before talking about others.
Copyright Notice: This article is the author's original article, the picture comes from the Internet, the text content of this article is strictly prohibited from being illegally reproduced without authorization, if you need to reprint or quote must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.