Last week, Argentine President Millet delivered a striking speech at the Davos Economic Forum, in which he fiercely criticized the "regulatory process" and enthusiastically extolled the idea of liberalism. He highlighted the government's ongoing policy adjustments, including downsizing the government, abolishing the peso and adopting the US dollar, as well as comprehensive liberalization and privatization. These policies have been widely discussed in society, but one of the decisions has sparked even more controversy – Argentina's refusal to join the BRICS.
Milley's speech in Davos
Milley's speech made waves at the Davos Economic Forum. He sharply criticized the failure of the regulatory process, called for more liberalism, and stressed that the government was making bold policy adjustments. These include reducing the number of government departments from 21 to 8 and retaining core ministries such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Defence, and the Ministry of Economy. In addition, he stressed the determination to abolish the peso, adopt the US dollar, and support full liberalization and privatization. These remarks demonstrate the Argentine Government's resoluteness in the face of challenges.
Argentina rejected the decision to join the BRICS
However, at a time when the society is hotly discussing this series of policies, the Argentine government has made a controversial decision to refuse to join the BRICS. Foreign Minister Mondino explained the decision at the World Economic Forum, saying that the BRICS countries have a strong political character and do not correspond to the goals of the Argentine government. This stance has sparked strong opposition from opposition parties in the country and questions from parliamentarians.
Questioning by opposition parties
Fifteen parliamentarians from the Argentine opposition "Fatherland Alliance" questioned President Milley. They demanded that Milley explain why he refused to join the BRICS, noting that such a decision could cause damage to the regional economy. The parliamentarians believe that Argentina should make full use of the power of the BRICS countries, and that refusing to join may not be in the overall interests of the country. The controversy has put Milley under difficult pressure from home.
Milley's dilemma and choice
Milley faced a serious dilemma in this decision. First, the Argentine economy is already in trouble, and the reluctance of international organizations to support it makes it difficult for them to find the right support. Second, refusal to join the BRICS could have a negative impact on Argentina's economy, especially if some provinces are more dependent on India, China and Brazil for commodity exports. Milley needed to find a balance between national interests and political stance, and this became a major challenge for him.
Wishful thinking and reality in Argentina
In addition, Argentine Foreign Minister Mundino expressed their desire to highlight relations with "liberal democracies", including the United States, Israel, New Zealand, Europe and Canada. However, there has been no obvious substantive response from the West to Argentina's overtures. This makes the wishful thinking of the Argentine government seem a bit too idealistic and does not necessarily have the desired support.
Challenges and prospects for the future
The Argentine government's decision has sparked heated debate at home and abroad, with the focus on their economic prospects and international standing. Milley's decision may be recognized if Argentina's economy improves, but he may face more skepticism and challenges if the economy continues to struggle. This decision will have far-reaching implications for Argentina's future development, and Milley will need to respond carefully in a complex international situation.
epilogue
Argentine President Milley's policy adjustment and decision-making have attracted wide attention at home and abroad. His speech in Davos showed the government's determination, but the decision to refuse to join the BRICS was controversial. Milley faces pressure and skepticism at home and needs to find a balance on the international stage. The future of Argentina will depend on the government's decisions and the country's economic direction, and this is a challenging time.