After a few months, the most incomprehensible thing is why a bracelet will circle the thigh of the truth, is it really so important to find the bracelet?
If the bracelet is to the truth, if it can play a role in the unrelated role of a husband and wife, whose sorrow is it? Xu Min? Non-also, can only be the sadness of FL! It is the sadness of society!
Should the truth of the 28-year case be trapped in a bracelet?
After seeing the 918T trial, Xu Min also looked for a bracelet on the Internet, and found the T trial from before the T trial, giving people the feeling that there is no truth if there is a bracelet, the truth cannot be out, the bracelet has the final say!
According to the current thinking, the dereliction of duty or child thief, press the bracelet, you can live a peaceful and happy life! If that's the case, congratulations, dereliction of duty or child thieves, your wish has come true! Now you can set up a feast for three days, and the firecrackers are fired in unison!
Because, it is certain that nowadays, no FF mom dares to provide a bracelet. Why, you know.
Is there bound to be truth if there is a bracelet? At the 918 trial, a mother who gave birth at the FF Maternal and Child Health Hospital in 1991 took out a bracelet.
At first, some people were really afraid, to what extent? In broad daylight, the witness went to the hotel where the witness was staying to threaten the witness not to testify in court.
The witness did provide a bracelet, made of gauze, with information such as the mother's name, bed number, etc.
The result! The defendant was very happy, if he had known that this witness was not a pregnant woman in HH Pharmacy, he would not have surrounded her in the morning. A false alarm.
For this bracelet from a hospital in the FF area in the 90s, the defendant was very dismissive. First, it was not the HH pharmacy, and other hospitals had bracelets that could not prove that the HH pharmacy must have one; second, the defendant actually said that it was either a bracelet or a gauze strip. In fact, most of the bracelets in the 90s were made of gauze strips, which in the eyes of the defendants was not a bracelet.
So, if there is a bracelet, there must be truth?
In the 28-year case, are all the doubts presented now really not worthy of the weight of a bracelet?
What does the importance of bracelets come from? After the exposure of the case in 28 years, many people think that it is not a wrong change or a steal, because it is impossible for a baby to exchange bracelets, clothes, and quilts by themselves.
Both families said that the bag was prepared by their own family, and Xu Min said that she also prepared clothes for the child. The defendant said that she did not prepare clothes, but her family prepared a quilt, and her family's quilt was carried by a panda.
Now, the hospital says that there is no bracelet, the bag quilt is unified, the bracelet is denied, the bag is also denied, the bracelet belongs to the hospital, the hospital is final, then the two families say that they have prepared the quilt, in the end there is no quilt? Guo Moukuan also said that he personally saw the nurse carrying a baby out of the delivery room with his panda gun bag, was this a lie?
If there is a quilt, will the baby change the quilt himself?
Now the hospital has denied the bracelet, denied its own quilt, that is to say, the HH pharmacy in 1992 did not have a bracelet, and the package was unified. However, the relevant obstetrics and gynecology experts said that the bracelet and the quilt are produced at the same time, there is a unified quilt there is a bracelet, it is because of the unified quilt, so there must be a bracelet, so it is convenient to distinguish the baby, the bracelet and the quilt are causal, because to unify the quilt, so it is necessary to wear the bracelet. (Pictured below)
Why did the best hospitals in HH only uniformly cover the quilt, but did not implement the bracelet required by the Ministry of Health in 1982?
There is a wonderful thing in this: as long as there is a bracelet and a bag, the wrong change cannot be established, because the child himself will not change, it must be artificial. Only when the quilt is uniform and there is no bracelet, it is possible to change it by mistake!
So does the panda carrying the gun's own quilt exist or not? Yes or no? Asking Lao Guo about this matter is not enough, you have to ask Zhao Benshan.
Xu Min, where did your homemade quilt go?
The hospital said that there was no bracelet, Xu Minfang said that there was, Xu Minfang had to find a bracelet full of FF. Both families say that it is their own quilt, and the hospital says that the unified quilt is unified? Does the hospital need to come up with the 1992 package unified purchase order to prove whether there is such a bidding procurement project?
Is the evidence for the 28-year case only a bracelet? As the most important legal evidence of medical disputes, why is it so undervalued in the 28-year case?
Altered medical records in multiple places, said to be clerical errors;
The original writing was a dead baby, and then it was changed to a live baby, it turned out to be a "citation" word for induction, and it took a lot of effort to change it to the word "Hugh" for maternity leave, and after all, it did not cover up the embarrassment of changing "dead" to "live", and the awkwardness of changing "introduction" to "Hugh" was also a clerical error?
The nurse was also bold, and the doctor had not yet issued a doctor's order, so she executed the doctor's order a day in advance.
The doctor prescribed the test form, but in court, the nurse who signed the doctor said that she had not executed the doctor's order, who carried out this doctor's order?
The plaintiff said that she did not hide her hepatitis B condition, and the outpatient doctor said that if she said she had hepatitis B, I would definitely write it to her.
After 14 days in the hospital, a pregnant woman with hepatitis B does not know that her child is infected with hepatitis B, and what you are most worried about should be this! Did you not ask, or did you ask the doctor not to tell you? How did you know that you had a hepatitis B mother who was blessed with a healthy child?
Since you have a healthy child, you should be happy! The first child was disabled, when the second child was born in 1992, the first child was 7 years old, which was completely in line with the policy, why did you have to hide for three years, and lie that the child was dead? How did he die? Induced labor? It turns out that the word "citation" is such a story.
The signatures in different handwriting on the medical records are not even known to me. A nurse bluntly said to xu Min's signature on the birth certificate held by Xu Min, "I signed it", but in the face of the signature of the executor of the doctor's order, he categorically said that he could not see clearly.
A caesarean section infected with the hepatitis B virus, with a red face and an intrauterine umbilicus wrapped around the neck for two weeks, was rated 9, and a baby born with a loud cry was rated 6.
The various doubts of the medical record are too clear for Teacher Gu Li to say, and I will not repeat it here!
However, why do you have to issue a fake birth certificate for Xu Min, which has the name of your department and a stamp that you have invalidated in 1984, and the person who supervises the printing is Geng Mou of your department. Du fans all said that the certificate was a false testimony made by Xu Min, but Xu Min really did not have this remarkable ability, and Geng Mou said in court that the word was signed by her. Why?
Suspicious medical records cannot be used as evidence, the bag of the panda carrying the gun cannot be used as evidence, the living baby cannot be used as a dead baby, and so on.
Only by finding the bracelet that only HH Pharmacy in the whole country does not have can it be considered evidence.
The 28-year case is indeed complicated.
If, the thigh of the truth of the 28-year case is encircled by a bracelet, and a change case in which the truth stops at a bracelet, it will surely be fixed in the year 2021 AD with its characteristic shame.