Lead
Recently, a dispute involving the off-site operation of game companies such as Guigang City, Guangxi City, Guilin Yunmeng Interactive Entertainment Network Technology Co., Ltd., and Nanning Interstellar Yunyou Network Technology Co., Ltd. has just broken out.
Huge fines, details of violations, and a movie-like battle over game rights, are you ready for this thrilling story?
Off-site operations: Game companies are on the cusp
This off-site operation dispute is like the plot in the movie, which is jaw-dropping.
The Guigang Municipal Bureau of Culture, Radio, Television, Sports and Tourism has pushed Guilin Yunmeng Mutual Entertainment and Nanning Interstellar Yunyou to the top with a single decision, fining 1 billion yuan, confiscating 20.77 million yuan of illegal gains, and confiscating a large amount of computer equipment, like a complete "digital destruction".
Off-site operation case: the counterattack of the game's fate
We dug deep into the penalty decision of the Guigang Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism, and the details involved in it are like a counterattack of game fate.
Copyright disputes and illegal operations of the game "Dragon Killer" have emerged one after another.
The company authorized by the original copyright owner was changed, the name was changed in violation of regulations, and the game suffix was added to form eight games, and the login interface was changed again and again, just like the "maze" in the game.
In this dispute, the punishment of the Guigang Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism is particularly severe.
Rivalry over jurisdiction: a battle for power at the pinnacle
Under the fine, the company involved in the case filed a dispute over jurisdiction in another place in an attempt to break free from the shackles of the fine.
However, the Guigang Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism is stern, insisting that there are players in Guigang who use and carry out illegal business activities, and they have the power to impose administrative penalties. It was a battle for power, which made the whole affair even more confusing.
Legal Experts' Interpretation: How Game Companies Can Avoid the Eyes of the Law
In this game copyright battle, legal experts have explained the mystery for us.
A lawyer said that when a game company operates in a different place, it must not be opportunistic, otherwise it is like playing a "legal gamble". The lawyer stressed that the product that has obtained the version number cannot be renamed at will, which is a high-risk adventure and needs to be operated carefully.
Impact: Game companies operate in different places, and the business environment is worrying
This off-site operation dispute has triggered deep thinking in the industry.
In the opinion of legal experts, gaming companies should always maintain compliance or pay a heavy price.
Some experts reminded that law enforcement in different places may lead to the problem of "grabbing jurisdiction" and profit-seeking law enforcement, which will have a negative impact on the entire business environment.
epilogue
This storm of remote operations is still brewing, and the company involved in the case has stated that it will file an administrative reconsideration and administrative lawsuit.
Which side are you on in this suspenseful story?
Do you support the courage of game companies, or do you agree with the strict enforcement of the local government?
Let's watch this legal version of "Life and Death Sniper" together and share your views in the comment area!
#我来唠家常#
【Disclaimer】Advocate positive social energy, the data picture comes from the Internet, and the infringement will be deleted immediately.