Just a few days after the Gregorian New Year, institutional reform work across the country has begun. Up to now, the formulation of reform plans for more than 20 provinces and municipalities directly under the Central Government has already begun, and the submitted reform plans have been approved by the Party Central Committee and the State Council. In the reform and adjustment of various local institutions, four departments are mainly involved, including the establishment of the Ministry of Social Work and the Data Bureau, the reorganization of the Science and Technology Bureau according to the current reality, and the abolition of the Rural Revitalization Bureau, and the merger of relevant functions into the Agriculture and Rural Bureau. It can be said that, as far as the current situation is known, this reform is a major measure for the implementation of the reform of central institutions throughout the country, and it will certainly have a major impact on local institutions at all levels. From the direction of reform, it can be seen that through in-depth promotion of social work, highlighting data management, improving scientific and technological innovation capabilities, and strengthening the revitalization of agriculture and rural areas, we will further improve work efficiency and stimulate institutional vitality. We also sincerely hope that through this "cocoon into a butterfly" reform, we can further enhance the country's overall competitiveness, alleviate social contradictions, and continuously improve the quality of people's lives.
From a macro point of view, the current institutional reform is based on the reform plan of the central authorities and in the light of the actual conditions of various localities to carry out deeper and more extensive reforms. From a micro point of view, although it is only a readjustment of institutions across the country, it has different meanings. As we all know, on the surface, the purpose of reform is to readjust some irrational institutional setups, outdated ideological concepts, and functions and missions. However, its fundamental purpose is to make the country more prosperous and powerful, the society more fair and just, and the people's lives more harmonious and beautiful. In the final analysis, it is all about better serving the people, adapting to the new environment and new challenges, and promoting sustained and healthy economic and social development. For this reason, we have updated expectations compared to this reform.
First, it is hoped that through this institutional reform, work efficiency can be improved and the operation mechanism can be optimized and improved.
It can be said that the reason for the phenomenon of low efficiency and redundant procrastination is mainly because individual regulations are set out of reality, and the breeding of bureaucracy and formalism is an important factor in reducing work efficiency. In recent days, the central media has published four articles in succession, all of which are directly pointing to the harm of this problem. Not long ago, there was an incident of mental breakdown among the masses in the government affairs hall of a certain place, and after active communication and coordination, the problem of this mass was immediately resolved. It can be seen from this that in fact, the key problem is not that the masses do not have enough materials and wrong procedures, but that our functionaries at all levels are too dogmatic and too mechanical in implementing the regulations of their superiors, and are unable to think and solve problems from the standpoint of the masses. And the core of this phenomenon is actually the idea of power at work, which is an extension of bureaucratic thinking and formalism. It is undesirable to use the very small power in one's hands to create difficulties for some masses to the greatest extent, and the harm is very great.
Judging from the situation of this reform, a new data bureau has been established, and I think everyone who lives in modern society knows the power of big data. If we can make full use of the advantages of big data, it can not only greatly facilitate the masses and reduce the number of times the masses run back and forth, but also be able to carry out work more accurately and effectively. Let's imagine that if there is the blessing of big data, will the staff still be troubled by some so-called supporting materials when carrying out their work? Obviously, it will not! Therefore, through the use of big data, we can greatly improve work efficiency, simplify work procedures, and really grasp some real situations, so as to provide the most accurate basis for the decision-making of our staff and relevant departments. Therefore, I have certain expectations for this institutional reform, hoping that through this institutional reform, we can truly improve work efficiency, simplify work procedures, and better serve the people.
Second, it is hoped that through this institutional reform, power supervision can be strengthened and social fairness and justice can be promoted.
In terms of institutional reform, not only the Data Bureau, but also the Department of Social Work, one of the responsibilities of the Department of Social Work is to monitor and evaluate, through the establishment of a monitoring mechanism, to supervise and evaluate social work, to ensure the quality and effectiveness of services. It is precisely because of this that in the future, all the problems encountered by the common people in their work, production, and life will also have corresponding departments for solving them, and through the supervision of power by this department, the problems of the masses can be more effectively solved. If the demands of the masses can be effectively resolved, it can also promote a more fair and just society from the side. Not only that, due to the factors of institutional reform, the relevant powers have become more centralized, the responsibilities have become clearer, and it has become more convenient for the masses to do things, which is also one of the important tasks of our current institutional reform. It is not only necessary to set up a few departments and withdraw and merge several units, but also to solve the problems that cannot be seen, that no one takes care of the problems, and that some people manage but cannot be solved. Through the integration of resources, we ensure that all people can get the best quality services, so as to continuously enhance the people's sense of happiness and gain.
Third, it is hoped that through this institutional reform, social contradictions can be resolved and the fundamental interests of the masses can be guaranteed.
It is undeniable that due to the invasion of various unhealthy trends of thought since the beginning of reform and opening up, we have neglected moral construction while developing economic construction. As a result, after some people and some groups have enjoyed the benefits of reform and opening up, their lives have begun to erode and their spirits have begun to corrupt. In this case, some vested interest groups have emerged, and these vested interests control the relevant departments of the state in important fields and have the right to speak, resulting in the voice of ordinary people cannot be known by the upper echelons. This is also one of the important factors for the general concentrated outbreak of social contradictions at present; in addition, along with the deviation of the social atmosphere, the concepts of many groups have also changed, and the idea of seeking profit and money worship has gained the upper hand; on the contrary, the spirit of selflessness and silent dedication has been neglected, and a vicious circle has been formed. Through this organizational change, I sincerely hope that this phenomenon can be fundamentally changed, and that if not completely change this phenomenon, it will give them a sense of crisis.
If they cannot sincerely serve the people, if they continue to engage in showmanship, put on official displays, play tricks, do not take the demands of the masses to heart, and fail to solve the problems that the masses are more likely to complain about, then they need to move their posts and drop their jobs. It is also necessary to let them feel the feelings of the masses when they report problems, and even more so, let them profoundly understand the troubles of the masses when they encounter problems that cannot be solved. In this way, from the perspective of putting oneself in one's shoes, we can enable them to conscientiously resolve social contradictions and ensure the fundamental interests of the masses. It can be said that this institutional reform is not only to promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity and adapt to the requirements of social development in the new era, but also to improve the institutional mechanism for the benefit of the people, for the people, for the people, to protect the rights and interests of the people, to listen to the voices of the people, and to accept the people's supervision.
Fourth, it is hoped that through this institutional reform, the vitality of the mechanism and system will be stimulated and the motherland will become prosperous and strong.
What I am most concerned about in this round of institutional reform is the withdrawal and merger of the Rural Revitalization Bureau, according to common sense, rural revitalization itself is part of agricultural and rural work, and it is really puzzling to take out this function alone. If the rural revitalization work is particularly important, it can be listed as the key points in the agricultural and rural work, but it is really unreasonable to take it out alone, and it will lead to duplication of functions, bloated institutions, and increased staffing burden. In my opinion, rural revitalization is only a part of agricultural and rural work, and should be synchronized with improving farmers' lives, reducing farmers' burdens, eliminating various restrictions in rural construction, restoring traditional rural culture, and beautifying the rural living environment. It can be said that only when the rural areas are developed, the peasants are prosperous, and the rural areas are stable, can the entire social sphere be harmonious, the country's rear security will be more secure, and can the economy and society achieve continuous development.
Judging from the development of the country in recent years, many of us take it for granted that farmers have not made much contribution, and I strongly oppose this view. Let's imagine for a moment: If there are no peasants, how can the problem of food for a large number of people in the cities be solved? Without peasant workers, who will build the high-rise buildings in the cities? If there are no peasant workers, who will produce the products of enterprises and factories? If there are no peasants, who will buy the houses in the cities? What household appliances and automobiles will go to the countryside, and what electricity, water, and network will be connected? Do you think it is only a unilateral improvement of the peasants' livelihood? In fact, it is necessary to let the peasants consume and promote the continuous development of the national economy by promoting peasant consumption. It is obviously impossible to expect that the small population in a city will be able to promote the development of a city and the progress of the whole society. On the one hand, the vast number of peasants are doing their own work and ensuring the country's food security through hard work; on the other hand, they are doing part-time work and selling their labor power to ensure that the country becomes a manufacturing power; on the other hand, they are also actively consuming money to make contributions to stimulating domestic economic construction.
Historically, the mainland is a large traditional agricultural country, with agriculture as the foundation and guarantee; the rural areas as the rear and reservoirs; and the peasants as labor forces and creators of social wealth. Therefore, I also hope that this institutional reform can "break out of the cocoon into a butterfly", reflect more relevant content that benefits the people at the bottom, agriculture, rural areas and farmers, and truly improve the work efficiency of government departments at all levels, reduce bureaucratic formalism and other unhealthy trends, and truly reflect the superiority of the socialist system that serves, protects and improves people's livelihood.
#How to change the reform of local institutions##Tell the truth##看见人间百态#