Before reading this article, I worked hard to click "Follow" in the upper right corner, which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Text |Se
Edit |Se
In China's match against Lebanon, Dai Weijun was suddenly hit in the face by the flying foot of an opposing player in the process of grabbing the ball, and fell to the ground in pain.
You may be like me, you think it's a red card, right? But what happened next was infuriating.
After watching the VAR replay, South Korean referee Ko Hyung-jin not only did not show a red card to the Lebanese player who caused the accident, Hamis, but also did not even give a yellow card! This can't help but make people question, what kind of penalty standard is this?
Event replay and controversy focus
Recalling that foul moment, Dai Weijun suddenly fell to the ground in the scrum, in pain.
Slow-motion replays showed that it was Lebanese player Khamis who hit Dai in the face with a high-footed move.
This kind of dangerous maneuver is extremely rare on the football field, let alone in such an important match.
The fans and the on-site commentators were stunned, and everyone was waiting for the referee's decision.
However, to everyone's surprise, the referee on the field, Ko Hyung-jin, decided not to take any disciplinary action against Khamis after the VAR replay.
The decision immediately caused an uproar among the fan base.
Voices on the Internet were overwhelming, and everyone was questioning whether such a sentence was fair.
"How can this not be a red card?!" "Did the referee not see that action?" "Dai Weijun is injured, this is so unfair!" Social media is full of doubts and angry voices.
This is not only a controversy over a specific decision, but also a question of the fairness of the football game.
This controversial incident has unwittingly become the center of discussion in football circles.
Doubts from international referee experts
In this "flying kick" incident that caused heated discussions, the opinions of international referee experts became the key.
These experts, who have rich experience in international football refereeing, naturally have their own unique views on the interpretation of football rules.
They point out that under international football rules, the head and face of players are areas that must be strictly protected.
In this case, any dangerous movement to the head should be considered a serious foul and should be punished harshly accordingly.
Experts believe that Ko Hyung-jin clearly failed to follow this principle in this decision, and his decision seems to go against the basic rules and spirit of international football.
"This kind of action should be directly red carded!", said one expert, "Protecting the safety of players is one of the most important principles of football, and any violation of this principle should be condemned."
In addition, the experts stressed that even fouls committed after an offside position should be awarded according to their gravity.
These views have resonated widely in the football world.
Many fans began to revisit the incident and raised more questions about the referee's decision.
This controversy is not only about Dai Weijun's personal experience, but also about the fairness of football matches and the safety of players.
The potential reaction of the AFC with the possibility of heavy penalties
In the face of such incidents and controversies, the AFC's response will undoubtedly be key.
In accordance with the AFC's practice, the referee's decision will be summarized and evaluated by the referee after the match.
In this "flying kick" incident, the decision of South Korean referee Ko Hyung-jin is likely to be the focus of their discussions.
If the AFC decides to follow FIFA's rules and penalty standards, then Ko Hyung-jin could face serious consequences.
According to FIFA rules, the referee's top priority is to keep players safe, and any apparent disregard for this principle can result in severe penalties.
In this case, Gao's decision may not only be considered a serious miscalculation, but may also be found to be unsportsmanlike.
Such heavy penalties may include a temporary or long-term ban on Ko, or other forms of punishment.
This is undoubtedly a huge blow to Gao Hengjin personally.
At the same time, it could also be an important precedent for the AFC when dealing with similar incidents.
For football fans, the AFC's decision is not only related to the fair handling of this incident, but also an important test of international football refereeing standards.
Against this backdrop, how will the AFC deal with it? This has undoubtedly become the focus of attention of many fans and media.
The position and follow-up actions of the Chinese Football Association
In this widely controversial "flying kick" incident, the position and actions of the Chinese Football Association have become a key part.
So far, the Chinese Football Association has not formally appealed or pressured the AFC over the incident, which has attracted the attention of fans and the media.
As the protector of the interests of the national team players, the Chinese Football Association should pay close attention to such incidents that affect the safety of players and take corresponding measures.
They can express their dissatisfaction with the referee's decision to the AFC through official channels and ask for further review of the incident.
This is not only to protect Dai Weijun's rights and interests, but also to maintain the fairness of the game and the good order of football.
From the perspective of protecting the players, the actions of the Chinese Football Association are crucial.
If they choose to be active, it will send a clear message to all players and the football community that any dangerous behaviour on the football pitch will not be tolerated and must be punished as it deserves.
This is of great significance not only for the Chinese team, but also for the entire football community.
In addition, this action by the Chinese Football Association will also demonstrate their sense of responsibility and influence as a national football association.
This will be an important step for them to safeguard the interests of the national team and promote the healthy development of football on the international football stage.
summary
The "flying kick" incident of Dai Weijun is not only a controversial topic of punishment, but also a major incident related to the fairness of football and the safety of players.
Naturally, fans would like to see the Chinese Football Association take decisive action to ensure that such incidents are properly handled.
Overall, this incident is not only a controversial point in football, but also a profound reflection on rules, fairness and security in the international football community.
We look forward to seeing more justice and fairness reflected in the future of football.
We will continue to monitor the subsequent development of this event.