Recently, a remark about the famous economist Song Qinghui has attracted widespread attention on social platforms. In two articles, he prayed for the blessings of Japan's disaster-stricken areas and criticized Huawei for terminating cooperation with domestic auto companies. As a public figure, Song Qinghui's remarks will inevitably be scrutinized and criticized by all sectors of society. However, before judging his statements, we should conduct an in-depth analysis that reveals the motives behind them.
Song Qinghui, a man who prayed for the safety of a foreign country and criticized his own businesses. This contradictory behavior gives a sense of incomprehension, but perhaps this is exactly what he wants to convey. He deliberately displays his open-minded and benevolent side, gaining public approval first and then making sharp remarks, and this sequence may well have a deep meaning. Song Qinghui hopes that through this order, the public's resistance to his criticism will be reduced, so as to occupy the moral high ground.
In his act of praying for the blessing of foreign countries, Song Qinghui showed his desire and goodwill for human peace. This open-mindedness can make him more recognized and respected by others. People will think that he is a person who cares about the world and is willing to give his heart to the peace of the world. And it is this open-mindedness that makes the public more willing to listen to his views.
However, when he turns to criticism of his own companies, the public may be more receptive to his remarks because of their previous identification with him. This shift in psychology has made the public more receptive to his criticism of his own businesses, and may even be more inclined to support his views. Because in their eyes, Song Qinghui has proven himself to be a person who upholds justice and good intentions.
This carefully arranged sequence allowed Song Qinghui to occupy the position of the moral high ground. He has earned the recognition and respect of the public by showing that he cares about the world and has an open outlook. This gave him more leverage to make statements critical of his country's businesses. The public will be more willing to listen to him, consider his views, and actively support his claims.
This sequential expression is more clever, but it does not mean that its point of view is superior. We also need to examine the basis of his criticism. He accused Huawei of working together in a way that hindered the industry, but offered no evidence. In fact, the adjustment of the direction of cooperation by enterprises is a market behavior, which should not be interpreted as a "punishment" one-sidedly. And his attitude towards the two things is obviously inconsistent, first taking care of the foreign country as a group, and then criticizing the country, which is logically inevitably considered ill-intentioned.
However, the reason why he expressed it this may also be sincere. His criticism of both Japan and Huawei can be understood as being out of concern for social development. He is worried about Japan's post-disaster reconstruction, and also worried about the breaking of the order of industry cooperation. This concern may be overly sensitive, but it is not entirely unreasonable.
Therefore, we should not over-interpret Song Qinghui's motives, but should look at them rationally. The important thing is to listen to their point of view, but not necessarily to fully agree with what they say. We can preserve our own judgment, respecting his right to speak out and thinking independently. Whatever the motivation, it makes more sense to rationally approach the problem itself. We need to find a balance between inclusiveness and open-mindedness and dialectical thinking, which is the right attitude to solve problems and promote social progress.