For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to be able to see more content in time, click "Follow" and I will update more wonderful stories and share different wonderful moments for you every day
The pain of exposure
A sensational event in the film industry made the highly anticipated TV series "Flowers" the focus of public opinion.
Directed by Wong Kar-wai and starring Hu Ge and Xin Zhilei, this drama originally aroused the curiosity and expectations of countless audiences with its mysterious plot.
The careless act of a stuntman named Wilderness Xiansen exposed Mr. A's true appearance on social platforms, making the audience's mystery about this TV series disappear abruptly.
This self-asserted exposure behavior made people think about the bottom line of the secrecy of film and television dramas, and also shocked the entire entertainment industry.
The anger of the audience
After Mr. A's true face was exposed on the stuntman's social platform, netizens expressed their anger and dissatisfaction.
The audience, who was originally looking forward to the development of the plot, felt an indescribable loss in the face of the plot that they accidentally learned.
The stuntman didn't seem to have thought about the huge repercussions that his one-man show might cause, nor did he realize that his actions could damage the perception of the entire TV show.
This kind of actor's personal behavior is in stark contrast to the crew's secrecy of the plot, allowing the audience to see an unusual "flower".
The thinking behind it
Xin Zhilei said in an interview that she regretted the stuntman's careless behavior and believed that this move ruined the finale of the entire play.
This can't help but make people think that the personal behavior of a stuntman actor can affect the overall effect of a film and television drama to a certain extent.
Does this mean that in today's era of social media, every detail related to a TV series can become the fuse of a storm of public opinion?
This has also triggered people's deep thinking about the norms and self-discipline of actors' words and deeds on social platforms.
The price of spoilers
The stuntman's self-proclaimed claims not only caused dissatisfaction among the audience, but also made people worry about whether such spoilers would have a negative impact on the show's ratings.
In today's increasingly competitive entertainment industry, the audience's choice has become more and more powerful.
An inadvertent spoiler can lead to a loss of viewers, which can affect the efforts and commitment of the entire crew.
For the stuntman, perhaps he didn't realize that his momentary actions could make him "unpopular" in the industry, because the audience would be wary of the "leaker".
Entertainment vs. Spectator Rights
The whole incident also made people reflect on the core issues of the entertainment industry.
In the era of entertainment, directors and actors are looking for how to attract attention and create topics to achieve higher attention and ratings.
While pursuing entertainment, should we pay more attention to the expectations and rights and interests of the audience? Is this kind of behavior at the cost of destroying the plot worthy of being tolerated and accepted? For the audience, they are more looking forward to the original plot experience than being spoiled in advance.
On this issue, a more balanced intersection between the supremacy of entertainment and the rights and interests of the audience may need to be found.
Contradictory exposure
This exposure is not only a matter of keeping the plot secret, but also involves the contradiction between modern social media and the entertainment industry.
In this era of information explosion, the free speech of actors on social platforms seems to form a sharp opposition to the crew's need for confidentiality.
Did the stuntman take into account the ripple effects of this decision when exposing Mr. A's photo? He seems to be chasing personal attention for the long term, ignoring the long-term interests of the team and the audience.
The power of the network
Driven by social media, this exposure incident quickly fermented, attracting the attention and discussion of a large number of netizens.
Not only did viewers express anger at the stuntman, but some people began to reflect on the role of social media in the entertainment industry.
As information spreads more and more rapidly, the words and deeds of actors on personal social platforms have become the focus.
In this era of "Internet + entertainment", the influence is no longer limited to the screen, but extends to the virtual social space, and actors need to be more careful in handling their images.
Director's choice
In this incident, director Wong Kar-wai's choice became the focus of attention.
Whether or not to reshoot Mr. A's scene has become one of the points of debate in the industry.
Some people believe that reshooting can restore the mystery of the plot and allow the audience to re-engage in the development of the plot, while others worry that reshooting may cause more confusion, including wasted time and financial costs.
The director's choice at this time will have a profound impact on the future of the entire crew, and it will also become a new topic of discussion in the industry.
The audience's choice
As the direction of the plot is exposed, the audience is also faced with an important choice.
Do you choose to continue to follow the drama and maintain a rational attitude towards the known plot, or give up watching it because of spoilers? This decision will directly affect the ratings and reputation of "Flowers".
The audience has to think not only about their own curiosity at this time, but also needs to make a trade-off between emotion and reason.
This may be a test of audience loyalty, but it also raises a key question for the entertainment industry, which is how to find a balance between confidentiality and communication.
Discussion of the future
The exposure incident has made people re-examine the way the entertainment industry operates, triggering thinking about the norms of actors' words and deeds, the director's decision-making rights, and the rights and interests of audiences.
In the future, it may be necessary to establish a stricter confidentiality system to regulate the behavior of actors and crews.
At the same time, the audience also needs to look at entertainment works more rationally and not be swayed by excessive hype and spoilers.
The entertainment industry needs to find a balance that can spark buzz while respecting the expectations and rights of audiences.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, delete or change it immediately after contacting.