It is reported that with the resignation of Polish Prime Minister Morawiecki in mid-December last year for a no-confidence motion, the government changed flags from 66-year-old Tusk to become the new Polish prime minister, and the outside world had a premonition that the country would undergo a "major policy change". Tusk served as prime minister during the Kaczynski administration and later became the EU's top executive official, with connections in several EU departments. So the "pro-Europeanism" of its policy is very obvious, the split between former Prime Minister Morawiecki and the EU deepened during his tenure, and Tusk was considered a "firefighter", bridging the relationship between Poland and the EU, the United States, of course, this will bring a different course.
The message mentions that although Poland is one of the most anti-Russian countries in Europe, their policies are incompatible with the European Union. For example, the European Union does not advocate sending mercenaries directly to Russia to fight to prevent the crisis from getting out of control, but Russia says that 70% of the mercenaries in Ukraine are from Poland, the European Union advocates maintaining "limited contact" with Russia, and Poland directly announces its boycott of the OSCE meeting between Russia and the EU. Therefore, since Tusk came to power, while the relationship between the EU and Poland has become closer, the first task is to make Poland's "anti-Russian line" more in line with the EU's strategy - as a country in the EU and within the framework of NATO, their every move needs to be controlled, not as rebellious as Morawiecki preached before that "the EU has become a puppet of Germany".
Earlier last week, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell recently met with Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski. During the meeting, Borrell suggested that countries provide Ukraine with "defensive long-range missiles", such as "Patriot" anti-aircraft missiles, to strengthen their own response capabilities to Russia, but Sikorsky put forward a new insight: to solve the threat from Russia once and for all, Ukraine needs to first provide strike long-range missiles to destroy various launch platforms and command centers in Russia. At the end of the discussion, the EU did not support Sikorski's statements.
Analysts believe that as a representative of the Tusk government, the plan to "strike at launch platforms in Russia" can be called more radical than during the Morawiecki period, although this is in line with the EU's policy of military aid support for Ukraine, but European countries will not agree to such an action: the consequences are completely unpredictable, and if Zelensky is used against some sensitive locations and is retaliated against by Russia, the EU will be dragged into the water. Russian military scientists also said that once a foreign country launches the first round of strikes against Russia, Russia will trigger a response mechanism to instantly lock on targets in NATO countries and then retaliate against them.
It is also worth mentioning that the EU did not echo Poland's proposal, to which Konstantin, a member of the upper house of the Russian parliament, responded that the new Polish leader has stepped up his provocation against Russia in the New Year, and their remarks are becoming more and more offensive. But Sikorski should consider a new question: Russia has been attacked by missiles from Europe, so how does he need to avoid Russia's retaliation? There is a comment on this: "Poland has just gone with an 'unsociable' prime minister, and a new cabinet with a more radical has come up, threatening to use missiles against Russia; if the EU had such determination, they would have personally gone out to help Ukraine fight the war, which shows that the anti-Russian is too radical and makes the EU uncomfortable." ”