Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also brings you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Recently, a video about homeless people on the streets of the United States has attracted widespread attention.
This homeless man used to be a genius who earned a doctorate in the United States and received American citizenship. However, more than a decade ago, his monthly salary reached more than 100,000 US dollars, but after years of hard work, he has been living on the streets for 16 years.
This is a thought-provoking story, and we can't help but ask: Why does a person in the United States who has obtained such a high degree and honor become a street person? This is a question worth pondering.
Such a character makes one wonder what caused him to fall into such a situation. It is understood that he used to be a talent, but among the reasons for work, his wife chose to divorce him, which led to mental problems and ended up living on the streets.
After learning about this situation, many people sympathized with him, believing that he could return to society and serve the country. However, we still need to know and think more about his current situation. Perhaps we can explore the reasons for this through dialogue and observation with him, and then find better solutions to help him get out of the predicament and reintegrate into the social family.
However, after learning about the experience of this wandering doctor, more netizens disagreed, believing that he should not be helped, let alone allowed to return to China. This is because this former international student went to the United States as a public student, but chose to stay there after completing his studies. This incident has sparked widespread concern and controversy.
In the case of many well-known celebrities speaking out, Hu Xijin, as a super Internet celebrity with more than 10 million fans, once again aroused the dissatisfaction and condemnation of netizens. In the comment area, the voices of condemnation were surging. This can't help but make people think, what did Hu Xijin say that made netizens so dissatisfied?
Hu Xijin said that he could not ridicule and accuse Dr. Wandering, no matter what he did wrong, he had already repaid it with 16 years of miserable wandering, and said that although Dr. Wandering was an American, he was also a child who went out of China.
In the face of netizens' comments and questions about Lao Hu's reasoning, Lao Hu Dadao's speech seemed to show a righteous and awe-inspiring attitude. However, for some netizens, Lao Hu's remarks seemed to be justifying Dr. Wandering's mistakes, which aroused their strong disgust and dissatisfaction.
In this case, some netizens even directly expressed confusion and doubts about Lao Hu's remarks, and even shouted at Hu Xijin: "People are Americans, what do you mean by this?" This kind of questioning voice indicates that some people have misunderstood Lao Hu's remarks, or they think that Lao Hu's remarks do not fully take into account different backgrounds and cultural differences.
In addition, there are also people who call on Lao Hu to help the doctor himself. This call suggests that some believe that Mr. Hu, as an influential public figure, should take the initiative to help the doctor in need. They believe that Lao Hu can use his influence to provide more support and help to the doctor, and at the same time help break down discrimination and prejudice in society.
Even those Fudan alumni who originally planned to go to help the wandering doctor were affected by this incident, and netizens asked: Who are these alumni who studied at Fudan and graduated from the United States?
Such questioning and questioning are not groundless. As a well-known university in China, Fudan University's alumni play an important role in all walks of life. However, the occurrence of this incident has made people question whether the actions and decisions of these Fudan alumni in the United States really meet the public's expectations and trust.
In the face of surging criticism and dissatisfaction, Hu Xijin once again expressed his opinion. He stressed that it makes no sense that the state would never spend taxpayers' money to run an average American. However, he also said that Fudan alumni paid out of their own pockets to help Dr. Wandering, which is a warm affection that deserves respect and praise.
In the face of public opinion, Lao Hu spoke out again, which attracted the attention and approval of the majority of netizens. However, some netizens said that Lao Hu is too tactful and always advances and retreats freely in the field of public opinion, which is difficult to convince.
Compared with Lao Hu, Zhang Xuefeng, another Internet celebrity, has been recognized by more netizens. Zhang Xuefeng's language is sharp and to the point, often to the point and resonates. His views are often endorsed and supported by netizens.
So what did Zhang Xuefeng say?
Mr. Zhang posted a comment on social media questioning a term used by media friends. He thinks that the use of the term "Wandering Doctor" is inappropriate, and that the focus should be on the person's willingness to go abroad.
Zhang's argument sparked a wide discussion because he pointed out an issue that might be overlooked. The topic has not only attracted public attention, but has also raised concerns among some who fear that Zhang Xuefeng may be attacked or blamed for it.
In fact, Zhang's views are not unfounded. The doctor was indeed an American, and his actions and words reflected more of his personal wishes and motives than his willingness to return home or not. Therefore, we should look at this issue more objectively, rather than simply reducing it to the willingness to return home or not.
Overall, Zhang Xuefeng's statement sparked widespread discussion and controversy. His views may have slapped some people in the face, but they are also a reminder that we need to be mindful of the accuracy and objectivity of our use of language. When discussing such issues, we should be more cautious and objective, and avoid over-reading and speculation.
In fact, he did not want to return to China to settle down, but only wanted to return to China to have a look, and expressed his hope that he would be helped to return to work on Wall Street. However, this attitude he showed can't help but make people think deeply.
First of all, we must acknowledge that everyone has their own choices and decisions, and everyone has their own lifestyle and values. In this story, the wanderer spends a long time overseas, which may be his own choice or the helplessness of his life. However, his choices and decisions do not mean that we should accept or support his actions.
Secondly, the homeless man has been cut off from his family for more than a decade, which is undoubtedly a very serious problem. His actions hurt not only his family, but also the feelings of society and others. He wants help getting back to working on Wall Street, but that doesn't make up for his past mistakes and hurts.
Finally, we need to recognize that everyone has a responsibility and obligation to comply with laws and ethics. The outcast's actions are clearly contrary to these norms, and we cannot expect any form of sympathy or support from him. On the contrary, we should encourage him to reflect on his own actions, take up his responsibilities and obligations, and actively seek solutions to problems.
In summary, the homeless man has been wandering overseas for 16 years, cutting off contact with his family and reluctant to return to his home country to settle. We should not expect any form of sympathy or support from him, but should encourage him to reflect on his actions and take up his responsibilities and obligations. Only then can we truly solve this problem.