First, can a grassroots civil servant draw conclusions about the overall national situation data based on the operation of his own department? Unless the data gap is really obvious, I think the subjective feeling here is unreliable.
Second, the statistical data of the Bureau of Statistics is calculated from multi-angle and multi-channel indicators, each of which corresponds to a different weight, through a specific program algorithm. Including but not limited to, the growth rate of the added value of large-scale industry, construction, agriculture and other industries, as well as the growth indicators of the total turnover of transportation, the sales area of commercial housing, the expenditure on general public services, and the business tax of other non-profit service industries; of course, there are several important parts, such as the added value of each industry and the value of each major index in the previous year, the price index of each major industry in the current year, and so on. In addition, there will be data review, data recalculation adjustment, etc. The data and accounting results will be as close to the real data as possible, rather than deliberately too little or too large. Due to the perfection of interests or statistics, there will be a slight underside or a large margin. However, in the accounting process, it is necessary to pursue the pursuit of being close to reality. This will affect the country's subsequent development and strategy formulation, and it must not be careless. This data can be regarded as actual data. Because the others are just blind people touching the elephant, and the angles are different.