Unexpectedly, the explosion in the first game of the year in the workplace was the expulsion incident.
The man went to work and was told that he had been fired, and the reason given by the company for dismissal was incompetence and survival of the fittest, and the man was not convinced and refused to be fired.
I found the company's HR theory and claimed that the other party was fired illegally, but I didn't expect that the other party was arrogant and said that I was fired illegally.
How arrogant the woman's attitude was at that time, how painful she was afterwards, and even bluntly said: You go to labor arbitration, the Labor Bureau, I have people in the first and second trials, whatever you want, I will break the law.
The man was clever enough to record the video and audio and keep the evidence. Around January 7, the incident was exposed.
As more and more people pay attention, more details about the incident also leak out.
Most of the videos exposed earlier are trivial, and there is a video that explains the process of the controversy relatively completely.
At the beginning of the video, a woman's voice sounded: Don't even think about the next salary.
Then, the man said that he was waiting for the Labor Bureau's... Before the words were finished, a woman with a mobile phone and an arrogant attitude appeared in the video, saying that I would be released illegally now.
After saying that, I kept emphasizing that I was expelled for breaking the law now, right now.
Good fellows, I've seen those who broke the law, but I haven't seen anyone who is eager to prove that they're breaking the law.
The woman seemed to be angry, and as she spoke, her hand kept pointing at the boy.
When the boy heard this, he also got angry and asked, why did you break the law and dismiss it?
When the woman heard this, she was disdainful and angry, her tone was full of helplessness, and she looked at the man and sneered, can you control it when I break the law?
Violating the law, generally violating the law, as long as it is discovered, will be subject to corresponding sanctions.
Most people have a certain reverence for the law and act within the scope of the law. But the woman in the video doesn't seem to be afraid.
After saying this, the man said Let's do it according to the law.
The woman didn't listen to the man at all, she just said yes, I broke the law, do you care?
The man quietly watched the woman perform there, and at this time, the camera was already on the woman's face.
The woman was thin and dressed in gray, but what she said was shocking.
The woman kept emphasizing that she was breaking the law, and if the man didn't answer the stubble, the woman questioned whether the man couldn't understand human words.
At this time, the man couldn't bear it anymore, and directly came to say that I listened to the labor bureau.
Seeing this, I can't help but wonder, is it a very honorable thing to break the law? Why do some people keep emphasizing that they are breaking the law? They are also worried that others will not know.
It's just that after listening to the Labor Bureau, the woman became even more angry.
The woman's face is also exposed to the video, and she stares at the man with wide eyes and without blinking.
Continue: You don't understand people, you go, you can go now. Now, immediately, pack my things and go.
The man just tried to explain that I was waiting for labor arbitration.
However, the discussion between the two does not seem to be on the same channel, each saying its own thing.
The little brother said Wait for labor arbitration, and the woman said I will cancel all the permissions of your company now, and let people leave quickly.
The man who took the video did not leave, and immediately after, the woman said the words that made her popular all over the Internet.
The woman was vicious, and her fingers kept waving and said I will fight a lawsuit with you, labor arbitration, first and second trial, I have someone waiting for you slowly.
After speaking, he gritted his teeth, became angry, and kept pointing his fingers at the parties.
In Chinese Xi, pointing a finger at a person to speak is a very disrespectful behavior, but the woman does this, which inevitably makes some viewers feel uncomfortable.
It's just that what people didn't expect was that the woman said in a slightly threatening tone that you can try it.
After speaking, he didn't seem to be relieved, and continued to export the quintessence of the country, and said that the man would not be able to find a job for two and a half years.
Forget it, and boast that I (the woman) will have food next month, you can figure it out for yourself. It's just that when he said this, there were some quintessences in his tone.
After speaking, the woman rolled her eyes and turned away in a dashing manner.
Walking a little further, the man followed suit, and the woman suddenly turned around and said You are here to fight with me.
The man really couldn't help it, and asked if he didn't have a sense of law.
According to the woman's words and behaviors, these in the video alone have been illegal, and the video has also become evidence of the violation, not to mention the contradictions with the employees, the behavior of the video alone is already a violation of the law. If it really offended, it was the woman herself who hammered herself on the pillar of shame.
Hearing the man's questioning, the woman became even more arrogant, calmly admitting that she just had no sense of the law, and telling the man that she was illegal.
These are all video recordings of men, and the woman also knows that the man has recorded videos, and after saying this, she threatens you to dare to upload it, and says that she wants to call 110.
The man was also speechless, and he was so arrogant when he broke the law.
After speaking, the woman picked up her mobile phone and dialed 110 to ask the man to leave her company.
At this point, the video is basically over, and the controversy is basically clear: the company fired the man, and the man was not happy.
Loading...
But what exactly is the contradiction?
Actually, it's okay to get together and disperse, there's no need to be so embarrassed, but the woman's attitude makes the incident more complicated.
After the video was released, what attracted attention was not the incident itself, but why the woman was so arrogant, knew the law, and threatened.
Most people want to know who this person really is and why he is so arrogant.
At first, some people said that it was the senior executives of the Shougang Group, a state-owned enterprise.
This matter is not a good thing, Shougang Group naturally noticed it, and it didn't take long to deny that the person was not from Shougang Group.
Shougang Statement
Just when the public wondered who this was, the company itself jumped out to clarify and issued a statement.
A statement from the woman's company
It's a statement, but it's not like a statement, it's more like a statement of the situation.
In the public information said a few points:
First, it admits that the female executive made inappropriate remarks in an emotional manner.
Second, it shows that the reason for the man's resignation is that he cannot help but pass the probationary period and is not capable of the job.
Third, the employee has already been paid severance compensation.
Finally, he promised to strive to create social value and clarify the retribution of women: suspension treatment.
In this statement, the contradiction between the two sides was indirectly acknowledged: the man was dismissed due to the resignation issue. However, there was no mention of the illegal termination of the contract, and only the result of the woman's suspension was given.
However, after such a "retribution" was made public, it did not calm the anger of netizens, and some people picked up the same incident as the man.
On December 13, 2023, the company targeted former employees in the same way, naming them "rumors."
There are also people who directly pick up the identity of the woman in the video, and the "bottoms" can be regarded as completely stripped naked: about work, about family, about education, about character.
It is reported that the woman's name is Jing Yue, born in 1977, with two children, who works in a company and is an executive of the company. In addition to his current company, he also worked for Yitong Loan, and was recently forced into a case.
But the public information shows that this person graduated from Tsinghua University, and when I see this, I can't help but feel that the original quality of this thing is really part of the school, and it seems that I will not look at the school with a filter in the future.
When things were fermenting, many people who had been colleagues with him also stood up and spoke out, and their evaluation was not good.
A netizen put it this way:
This person is the chief human resources director of Beijing Pingxin Technology Co., Ltd., a native of Beijing, born in 1977, with two children. This person has worked in HR in many companies, and has also worked in companies engaged in fundraising fraud, and this person has a very poor reputation in the industry!
When they saw this, many people thought, why bother? One person overturned the entire company, and there was no one.
In addition to his identity information being revealed, the company involved was also implicated.
The company was founded in 2016 and has been around for 8 years now. However, when many people inquired about this information, they also found a phenomenon: the executive director of the company where the female executive worked and the company where the supervisor worked before belonged to the same person.
This information made the incident more and more intense, and at this time, the well-known big V Hu Xijin was also involved.
He said that judging from the video, both the woman's behavior and the behavior of the person who posted the video were illegal. What he said is indeed true, if it is really a lawsuit, in fact, both sides are at fault.
However, returning to the incident itself, what exactly is the matter with resignation? Why is there a contradiction? What kind of contradiction is it exactly? Why has the contradiction not been resolved and evolved into the way it is now?
Just as everything was getting worse, the person concerned stood up and said something he didn't know, which was also shocking.
Screenshot of the statement issued by the party
First, he denied the statement that he was incompetent, revealing the truth about his dismissal: because he questioned the company's non-compliance.
Secondly, the reason for the resignation of the industry was explained. Piracy tools are prevalent, and there is no guarantee of quality.
Finally, the man worked as an engineer and wrote a program. Pirated software, although easy to use, but the source code problem cannot be solved, there will be various bugs.
If all his statements are true, the contradiction here is basically clear: the conflict between personal aspirations and the interests of the company.
The company makes money and wants to reduce costs, but the engineers pay attention to quality, and the quality is relatively reliable, but the cost of piracy is relatively low, so there is a scene of being fired and things continue to ferment.
Actually, it can be solved with harmony, there is no need to make trouble to this point, if it is really a difference in ambition, it is good to separate. But the woman's attitude and the man's anger have escalated the situation.
Now, the statement issued by the parties is the latest follow-up, and the outcome is unknown for the time being.
At this point, I suddenly felt that dreams and means did not seem to be available at the same time, and the quality was uneven after all.
Finally, don't dig a hole for others, be careful about jumping into the pit you dug yourself.