#Article First Release Challenge#On the evening of January 2nd, the welfare lottery is out again!The host broadcast the next winning number in advance, and then the director cut off the live broadcast screen and immediately inserted an advertisement.
After the incident was exposed, it attracted great attention and heated discussions, and netizens questioned the fairness of the lottery.
On the evening of January 2nd, the Fucai lottery center opened the lottery as usual, and the foreign phase came out of the lottery process of "Happy 8".
The lottery process of the first 6 balls was very smooth, and the winning ball numbers were 40, 47, 32, 69, 51, and 35, and the host also waited for the ball to stop before announcing the winning ball number.
However, the strange happened when the seventh ball was about to fall, and the seventh was the 77th ball, but before the ball stopped, the hostess had already broadcast it, but she was not talking about 77, but 74.
Sure enough, after the eighth ball fell into the bag, it was No. 74. Netizens said that it would be 74, but it was stuck, and 77 came out.
For the host, it may be understandable to report the wrong number of the seventh ball, but she directly said the number of the next ball, which is too low, can the host still predict the winning ball number?
After the video was spread, netizens questioned the fairness of the lottery process, could it be that the host memorized the wrong order of the winning numbers?
However, when the audience was still in a state of confusion, the live broadcast screen was cut off, and an advertisement appeared in front of them. This made netizens even more suspicious!
This sudden situation made netizens have to wonder if the host had reported the wrong number before, was it really boring, and the live broadcast screen was cut off, does it mean that the director was also panicked?
On January 5th, the Welfare Lottery Issuance Management Center issued a statement saying that this online video was artificially patched and grafted, and it has been reported to the police.
Whether it was a patchwork or not is unknown. When someone went to the official website of the China Welfare Lottery to check the current replay, they found that everything was normal when shaking the 77th and 74th balls, and the host did not give a false alarm.
The author believes that there may be the following possibilities to explain this "small probability event".
First, it is pure coincidence, as the so-called no coincidence is not a book. Maybe the host mistook 77 for 74, and it just so happened that the next number drawn was 74. This coincidence, while extremely unlikely, is not impossible.
After all, spending 100,000 yuan to buy the same set of numbers can win 220 million, what else is impossible?
The second may be that the hostess guessed the winning number intuitively, and they all said that the woman's sixth sense was very accurate, perhaps it was this ability that played a role at that time.
The last possibility is that the hostess knew the winning number in advance, because she was nervous and reported the wrong number.
After the last 220 million bonus was questioned by netizens, a lawyer sent a letter to the Jiangxi Civil Affairs Department to consult the matter. However, more than 20 days have passed, and there has been no response from the other party.
The lawyer joked that "a punch on the cotton,It's not a good thing!",However, this time"Happy 8" reported the wrong number incident,Fucai Center came out for the first time to refute rumors,The attitude can be described as a 180° turn。
Although the fucai center insists that the online video is a patchwork,Some netizens still insist on claiming that they "watched the live broadcast,The host did report a number behind in advance。
Netizens from all walks of life have commented on this matter, "It's a fast read", "I'm poor, but I'm not stupid".
Since the official said that the online video was patchwork, it must be edited and pieced, and we can only believe the official statement.
But the last "220 million grand prize incident", after so long, hasn't it been investigated?