Recently, the design of commemorative coins and banknotes for the Year of the Dragon has caused widespread controversy. Some people bluntly said that the design was really disappointing this time. The design of the commemorative coin is still traditional, and there is no sign of innovation. Even more worrying is the fact that the commemorative banknotes do not seem to have broken through in terms of high technology at all, raising doubts about whether someone is lazy.
Compared with the previous 70th anniversary 50 yuan commemorative banknote, the newly designed commemorative coin pales in terms of condition, atmosphere and luxury.
Some people can't help but sigh, is this the work of the same production team? The high-tech content of the commemorative banknotes of the Winter Olympics has even overshadowed the commemorative coins of the Year of the Dragon. In contrast, people can't help but sigh that the design gap this time is too big.
Some people describe the Year of the Dragon coin as a small stamp, and some even think it is more like a New Year's painting.
This figurative metaphor makes one shake the head, for a commemorative coin, should we pursue a higher level of art and technology, rather than staying in the traditional form?
In addition, some people even questioned the material of the commemorative coin, saying that it is almost plastic. This skepticism has also raised concerns about the craftsmanship and raw materials, and people have begun to focus on whether the commemorative coins were made to meet the relevant quality standards.
Overall, the design of the Year of the Dragon commemorative coins and commemorative banknotes has indeed sparked widespread discussion in society. For a commemorative coin, whether it has higher artistic value and scientific and technological content, as well as whether it meets the quality standards, are serious problems in front of the production.
