Recently, the remarks of Hu Xijin, an internationally renowned figure, have aroused widespread concern in society. His words and deeds in the face of disasters such as earthquakes and when he dabbled in sensitive topics have aroused heated discussions. Why did it cause such a big response? We will interpret it from the views expressed and the feedback of netizens.
On January 5, at the beginning of the new year, a serious natural disaster occurred in Japan, the 7.4 magnitude earthquake, which attracted the attention of the world, and attracted attention from all walks of life. As a representative of well-known Chinese media professionals, Hu Xijin naturally actively participated in relevant hot discussions.
First of all, Hu Xijin expressed his personal views on the earthquake, clearly pointed out the seriousness of the earthquake, and expressed his concern and blessings to the victims. In addition, he reminded the Japanese people to return home safely. At the same time, he pledged to continue to monitor the development of the matter, reflecting the depth of his concern about the situation.
However, the next piece of news has sparked domestic attention. A fire broke out on a Japanese flight carrying more than 400 passengers, which subsequently attracted the attention of netizens. In this regard, Hu Xijin once again published several topics, expressing great concern about similar incidents. This made him attract more attention and discussion from netizens on social platforms.
However, when we look back at his past remarks, we find that he is inconsistent in his words and deeds on such topics, contradictory and dilemma. For example, in the aftermath of the earthquake in Gansu, although he expressed sympathy and condolences, his sentences were brief and lacked depth, which was significantly different from his performance on the earthquake in Japan. Similarly, in the Hainan TV anchor case, although he advocated that public figures should have a high level of freedom of speech and decision-making ability, he then publicly supported the anchor to be given a chance to make corrections. His position in both cases is very contrasting.
In addition, in the face of hot topics in society, such as the problem of Vietnamese veterans, the problem of drug stars, and the problem of indiscriminate fees for concerts, his high-profile intervention and attitude have attracted people's doubts, and many comments have caused public dissatisfaction. Some careful netizens pointed out that Hu Xijin always seems to be standing on the cusp of public opinion, making many remarks, causing Internet storms and involving many social bottom line issues.
Regarding the public's doubts and condemnation, Hu Xijin said that he could accept it, saying that he was "willing to accept public reflection and criticism". From his response, it can be seen that the well-known public figure is indeed aware of his words and deeds and is willing to make adjustments accordingly.
This incident undoubtedly shows the influence of public figures and the different results of their statements on different occasions. Although Hu Xijin may face public skepticism and criticism, this kind of interaction and conversation has become an effective mechanism for public opinion supervision, which helps to promote social transparency. Therefore, we look forward to more citizens with public awareness and a sense of responsibility to participate in the discussion of various social issues and jointly promote social progress, harmony and stability.