Before reading this article, please click "Follow" so that it is convenient for you to discuss and share, and at the same time, it can also make you feel a different sense of participation, thank you very much for your support!
Topics such as the prosperity and development of Deyun Club and whether Song Zude's prophecy came true have attracted widespread attention.
These events have not only led us to re-examine the influence and responsibility of public figures, but also to debate the dialectical relationship between freedom of expression and responsibility.
As one of the most representative and influential brands in China's cross talk industry, Deyun Club has won the laughter of countless audiences with its unique humorous style and innovative performance methods.
As their popularity grew, so did their words.
It is precisely because of this that after some members have been involved in negative reports in the past period, many people have begun to doubt and even question how much innocence and credibility they claim to be noble, elegant, and humorous.
On the other hand, the controversy over whether Song Zude's prophecy came true has also triggered the public's thinking about the relationship between freedom of speech and responsibility.
As a public figure, Song Zude has repeatedly posted various remarks through TV shows and social media, and claimed: Deyun Club will collapse before 2024, and climb from Guangzhou to Foshan before it is realized.
The incident has once again sparked public debate about the responsibilities of public figures when they use speech.
On the one hand, as a figure of great influence, Song Zude must be aware of the possible consequences and repercussions behind his words.
He should realize that advanced artists have an obligation to better spread positive energy and advocate positive values on different platforms, whether they are traditional or online.
It is even more important to think about how public figures can fulfill their responsibilities while upholding freedom of expression.
Surprisingly, Song Zude suddenly changed his attitude on social platforms and began to praise Guo Degang's talent and achievements in the entertainment industry.
Such a stark contrast makes one wonder if there is some kind of secret friendship or potential partnership between them.
This incident immediately aroused the interest and curiosity of the majority of netizens.
After all, for a long time in the past, Song Zude has repeatedly criticized and belittled Guo Degang and his team, "Deyun Club", through various channels.
Therefore, the fact that he has changed his words so obviously to praise him now has undoubtedly touched the speculation of many people.
Some netizens inferred that Song Zude's statement may be out of some interest or there are some dark box operations behind it.
In the entertainment industry, there are often frictions and contradictions between celebrities due to business cooperation, brokerage relationships, and the distribution of interests.
Therefore, when seeing Song Zude make such a positive evaluation of Guo Degang, many people began to worry about whether there was a bigger conspiracy brewing.
There are also some netizens who have a more objective attitude and think that maybe Song Zude is really good to change.
They point out that everyone develops and grows over time, and that there may be shifts in thinking and positions.
After all, the cross talk world is a field full of controversy and tradition, and the two celebrities who have been active in it for many years must have profound talent and wisdom.
No matter what kind of interpretation looks at this incident, it cannot be denied that it has incorporated a trace of subtlety and surprise into the public news vision.
We know that the entertainment industry is an unpredictable and dramatic stage, and it is not surprising that all kinds of stories occur in it.
Perhaps, the change in the relationship between Song Zude and Guo Degang is just one of the microcosms.
As 2024 approaches, a high-profile question has surfaced: If Deyun had not gone bankrupt, would he also be held accountable for the irresponsibility of the possible public opinion he had spread?
This is an exciting question, and it is necessary to consider many factors when exploring its connotations in depth.
It is worth thinking about the evaluation of Song Zude and other similar incidents that are full of a large number of "taken out of context" behavior.
As a public figure or media professional, you must assume a certain degree of basic principles such as integrity, impartiality and objectivity when expressing your opinions.
If individual slips of the tongue or individual examples are infinitely exaggerated and interpreted to point to a definite outcome, the flippant transmission of information can have a detrimental effect.
In referring to such cases, care should be taken to distinguish between the subtle distinction between what constitutes an expression of opinion and the spread of rumours.
In the era of social media, where forms are diverse and information flows at a high speed, people's lack of discernment and reflection on speech and expression often forms a kind of blind trust or subjective assumption.
Therefore, while advocating free speech, it is also necessary to examine it in a responsible, objective and impartial manner.
It is important to note that the essential characteristics of "prophecy" are not unattainable.
Judgments and deductions made by individuals and institutions have their prerequisites and limitations.
The principle of "information validity" should be adhered to in the opinion expressed by Mr. Soong Zu-tak on past and future events: in the absence of conclusive evidence, it is not easy to equate what he says with the truth.
Of course, when studying the issue of freedom of expression and responsibility, it is necessary to pay attention to the fact that there are complex interests behind the dissemination of news.
From a political point of view, quoting the views of netizens with such a large fan base and influence can bring huge benefits to certain groups;
From a commercial point of view, it is possible to obtain economic profits by creating public opinion turmoil.
Therefore, it is necessary to remain vigilant and carefully assess which of the many statements can truly serve the public interest.
In conclusion, freedom of expression is an important right in modern society, but it should also go hand in hand with responsibility.
When faced with content that may attract public attention, it is necessary to maintain rational thinking and objective judgment, and respond to it in light of the actual situation.
Only in this way can we find a more secure and feasible place in the pursuit of public interest and balancing the demands of all parties.
It is impossible to predict whether Deyun Club will go out of business, but it is necessary to fulfill the obligation to defend the truth, convey the value message and promote social progress for those who spread irresponsible speech. (Only published on the headline account, other platforms are ported)
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance.
If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible!