Xiao Chenghao's suspension continued to ferment, and the chain reaction caused by it also intensified. In this year when almost all public account articles cannot be read, why did this start from the controversy of personal social media remarks, why has it become the focus of attention? We seem to be able to see all kinds of dilemmas and reflections in this era.
At the beginning of the matter, it was actually very ordinary. Xiao Chenghao only used the earthquake as an opportunity to talk about Japan's nuclear sewage discharge on his private Weibo, and his attitude was relatively harsh. But because of his status as a TV anchor, this statement was quickly amplified on the Internet, causing endless debate.
Amid the criticism in the field of public opinion, Xiao's TV station decided to suspend him. This punishment undoubtedly added fuel to the fire of the past, and more netizens suspected that the punishment was too severe. They asked, Xiao is just expressing his personal attitude, why does he want to "correct the Fa" to the point of asking for his job?
The skepticism has not subsided. As time went on, more and more public account articles sided with Xiao, accusing the TV station of not being tolerant of different voices. Some people even pointed the finger at the director and demanded that the relevant departments be held accountable.
That's not the end of the story. At the same time, some netizens are also checking the previous remarks of Hu Xijin and other big Vs. Interestingly, these opinion leaders, who claim to be "generous and generous", themselves expressed a similar view a few months ago - defining a certain earthquake in Japan as "heavenly curse".
Such an obvious double standard made Hu Xijin immediately fall into passivity. He could only explain bitterly that the "context was different" at that time, but it was no longer helpful. Countless netizens gloated and ridiculed him for knocking down yesterday's self today.
Therefore, this seemingly ordinary incident has always highlighted the various dilemmas in the field of public opinion in this era. It not only reflects the seriousness of the flood of information in the online environment, but also makes people wake up to the blindness of the public's critical perspective.
Of course, as a public figure, Xiao Chenghao needs to be responsible for his own speeches, and he should be more cautious in his words. But the punishment of the TV station is also debatable, and it reflects a rigid and conservative ideological scrutiny.
We must understand that as our national power grows, China needs to show the open-mindedness and open-mindedness to match. This is not only about the harmony of the international environment, but also about the healthy growth of our next generation. Only by being tolerant can we unite our efforts and overcome difficulties.
Life is like the sea, and it is impossible for every wave to surge according to your heart. We must find a balance between the waves, between the lost east corner and the harvested mulberry. This requires a broad vision from top to bottom, and we need to effectively improve the existing comment environment, which is the profound reflection brought to us by the Xiao Chenghao incident.
The rapid escalation of the Xiao Chenghao incident is a microcosm of the radicalization of public opinion in contemporary China. It reflects the fact that a misreading of just one or two sentences can trigger a moral judgment and a price storm.
In fact, this is a civilisation that we still need to continue to work rational Internet public opinion. It needs the restraint of technical means, the improvement of the legal system, and the improvement of the quality of civil society.
Many times, we need to put ourselves in the shoes of other countries. The earthquake has caused great damage to ordinary Japanese people, and we deserve humanitarian care. At the same time, it is also necessary to make it clear that there is a distinction between national interests and personal feelings. Prevent forces with ulterior motives from conflating the two and creating antagonism.
This is the mind that a mature country should have. China needs to be open-minded and tolerant, which is the historic mission of our generation. Let us draw wisdom from behind the events and find consensus in the rational Internet, which is a broad road for us to continue to move forward on a new journey.
#文章首发挑战赛#