Recently, a dispute caused by the man asking the woman to return the bride price due to the fact that he did not have sex with him for half a year after the wedding ended, and the final judgment ruled that the woman needed to return part of the bride price to the man, which attracted widespread attention and heated discussions in the society. Behind the controversy, multiple voices about marriage, money and legal responsibilities have emerged, and netizens shouted, fortunately, they did not have sex together, otherwise they may be empty.
Some people commented that it is enough to earn 40,000 yuan in one month of marriage. This view has led to reflections on the bride price system, with some questioning whether the role of money in marriage should be more emotional than materialistic.
On the other hand, some people questioned the excuse that the woman was busy with work, thinking that it might just be an excuse for not wanting to obtain a certificate. This has led to a rethinking of the responsibilities and commitments of both parties in marriage, with some calling for greater appreciation of each other's true intentions and commitments in the relationship.
Some netizens suggested that when falling in love, you should keep good financial evidence. This may be a reminder of money issues in marriage, emphasizing the importance of being sensible in relationships to avoid disputes in the future.
Some people see a woman's bride price in marriage as a surefire investment. This view reveals the complex attitudes of society towards the bride price, which on the one hand is seen as a traditional way of expressing respect, and on the other hand, it questions its commercialization and objectification.
Some people suggest that the woman may not like the man, which leads to different rooms after marriage. This ignited a debate about the authenticity of marriage and the basis of feelings, and made people think about whether marriage should be based on real feelings.
Some people also use the "refund-only" policy of big platforms as an analogy, arguing that there should be a similar mechanism in marriage. This may be an idea that the marriage relationship should be more flexible and more focused on the real needs of both parties, emphasizing that marriage should not just blindly follow traditional rules.
This marriage controversy, which has not been in the same room for half a year, has triggered a multi-level thinking about the marriage system, money and feelings in society. The court's decision has also prompted society to think more deeply about how marital disputes should be resolved and how to better maintain the balance of marital relations within the legal framework. This case has pushed the marriage issue to the forefront of public opinion and has become the focus of attention and thinking from all walks of life.