#文章首发挑战赛#
I think Xiaomi may become another great technology company, or it may become an assembly company without core technology, or it can even be lost in the tide of economic development, and of course it may develop into a company that surpasses Huawei in terms of market capitalization, turnover, and achievements, but Xiaomi will never become a second Huawei. The main reason is that its founders have different experiences, different personalities, and different patterns, which influence and determine that the two teams cannot be the same.
In the TV series "Bright Sword", Li Yunlong said: "The character and temperament of the first military commander of a unit will inject soul into this army and form a fine tradition unique to this army." No matter how the years go by and how the personnel change, the soul and traditions of this force will always remain. “
Huawei's founder, Ren Zhengfei, is low-key, ambitious, long-term, he founded Huawei at the age of 43, his experience as a soldier and a scientific and technological personnel, so that he is determined to be passionate and pragmatic, he created Huawei's unique virtual equity incentive mechanism, and recruited a large number of talents. The "wolf culture" advocated by him of "saving each other with defeat, and toasting with celebration if winning" made competitors fearful. He was named "a tough guy who fights for ideas" by Time magazine.
Lei Jun, the founder of Xiaomi, has been known as a "prodigy" since he was a child, participated in the establishment of Kingsoft Company during college, founded Xiaomi at the age of 41, and made Xiaomi a household name during 8 years, with a high-profile temperament, good at marketing, and keen to capture the hot spots of the Internet era and create topics.
Under Ren Zhengfei's leadership, Huawei is committed to scientific and technological self-reliance, and its R&D investment is among the best in the world.
Xiaomi and Huawei, both the pride of China's high-tech development, each company has its own characteristics best, there is no need to be the same, this is neither meaningful nor possible. It is hoped that these two companies can maintain their own characteristics, share the same goal in scientific and technological innovation, and jointly contribute to China's scientific and technological progress.