In the waves of the South China Sea, geopolitical undercurrents are surging, and the actions of each country are like a child on a chessboard, affecting the stability and peace of the entire Asia-Pacific region. Recently, a series of actions by the Philippines on the South China Sea issue have aroused widespread concern. Its move to strengthen cooperation with Japan in the field of defense is particularly alarming. This so-called "crazy behavior" not only challenges China's long-standing efforts to maintain peace and stability in the region, but also may become a new destructive factor for regional security.
It is worth pointing out that the Philippines is not alone. The United States, Australia, India and other countries have also intervened in the situation in the South China Sea, and such external interference has undoubtedly increased complexity and uncertainty. However, in the face of this background, China has shown relatively large strength and influence. After remarkable economic and technological progress, China has become an important player to be reckoned with in the region.
It is true that in dealing with the South China Sea issue, China has always upheld restraint and followed the principles of international law. But given the aggressive nature of the Philippines' recent actions, combined with Japan's involvement in military support, it may be time to examine whether the current strategy is adequate to deal with the current situation. Letting go of overly moralistic shackles and taking a tougher stance may be more effective in defending China's rights and interests in the region.
In addition, when assessing military cooperation between the Philippines and Japan, we cannot ignore the fact that when a country takes excessively provocative actions and tries to strengthen its voice through alliances, it may instead push China to accelerate its own military and related capabilities, and prompt other countries in the region to reassess their cooperation with China.
The comparison and comparison make it clear that while the Philippines is trying to elevate its position and influence through provocative acts, it is somewhat flippant and even somewhat impersonal compared to China's vast and growing power base. In the end, in this game in the South China Sea, which is full of variables and bargaining chips, reason, restraint and acting in accordance with international rules will be the safest and most efficient path.
In the face of the possibility of more similar incidents in the future, we must be prepared and willing to show decisive power when necessary, on the basis of the fundamental interest of ensuring regional security and stability. Such a decision does not simply mean the use of force – firing the "first shot" should not be the first choice – but it must be made clear to all participants that there is no room for compromise when it comes to preserving sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Overall, China has made clear its position on the South China Sea issue: it advocates a peaceful settlement of disputes, opposes any form of provocation, and is committed to resolving differences through diplomatic means. However, in the current complex and volatile situation, it is crucial to take a firm stance while maintaining strategic flexibility. After all, navigating the waters of the South China Sea, with its geopolitical undercurrents, is no easy task, and only those who can be patient and show their strength will eventually be able to sail to the other side of peace.