After the audience was looking forward to it, "Flowers" finally met us. However, after watching the first two episodes, many viewers have said that the show did not meet their expectations, and some even chose to abandon the show. So, why can't even a powerful actor like Hu Ge join in to save "Flowers"? This article will explore this issue from many aspects.
First of all, there is a problem with the foreshadowing of the plot. As an urban drama, "Flowers" should have a solid story foundation to attract audiences. However, in the first two episodes, many viewers said that the construction of the plot was not compact enough, and even dragged on. This has led to the audience's inability to quickly engage in the story and lose the motivation to continue following the drama.
Secondly, the portrayal of the characters lacks depth. A good drama is usually inseparable from well-shaped characters. However, none of the characters in "Flowers" seem to be endowed with enough connotation and personality. The audience's emotional identification with the characters in the play is not high, and it is difficult to really resonate. Coupled with the fact that the development of the relationship between some characters seems too flat and lacks dramatic tension, this also makes the whole series unattractive.
Moreover, the overall style of the series is misunderstood. "Flowers" is positioned as an urban inspirational drama, but it is too heavy in the way it is presented. The audience expects to feel the transmission of positive energy and the hope of life when watching, however, "Flowers" seems to emphasize more on the cruelty of society and the sinister nature of human nature. This kind of unexpectedly unexpected expression The comparison between the creation of "Flowers" and "The World" is just like Hu Ge's acting skills are inadequate in "Flowers", which is disappointing. There is no doubt that "Flowers" wants to abandon the drama after only watching two episodes. In contrast, "The World" has an irresistible charm in its creation.
First of all, "Flowers" has problems with the plot setting. The plot drags too on, the plot develops slowly, and it lacks appeal. In contrast, "The World" has a tight plot, with ups and downs in the plot, which is unpredictable, and every episode can surprise the audience. This tight and gripping narrative makes the audience can't help but be drawn into the plot and want to find out.
Secondly, the character image of "Flowers" lacks depth. Although there are many excellent actors to join, such as Hu Ge, etc., the shaping of the character image is superficial. It is difficult for the audience to empathize and emotionally project the characters. However, the character image of "The World" is relatively mature. Each character has a distinct personality and a rich inner world, allowing the audience to truly feel their joys, sorrows, and sorrows.
In addition, "Flowers" lacks colloquial characteristics in the way it is expressed, which makes it impossible for the audience to resonate. Modern audiences' pursuit of plot has become more and more inclined to express themselves in a way that is real and close to life. And "The World" does exactly this, the dialogue in the play is smooth and natural, and a lot of colloquial expressions are used, so that the audience can better integrate into the plot.
To sum up, there is an obvious gap between "Flowers" and "The World" in terms of creation. Although "Flowers" has a group of excellent actors to join, there are deficiencies in the plot setting, character building and expression, which makes the audience want to abandon the drama after watching two episodes. And "The World" has successfully attracted the audience's attention with its compact plot, in-depth character building, and colloquial expression, and has become an unforgettable and excellent work.