#Police report woman reported attempted rape by chairman of state-owned enterprise#
On December 29, a woman surnamed Jiang in Guangxi reported through an online self-media platform with her real name: Dai, Secretary of the Party Committee and Chairman of Guangxi Financing Guarantee Group, took advantage of a business trip in Liuzhou to rape her.
After her violent resistance, Dai's rape attempt failed, but the incident caused her great physical and mental harm, and the woman was diagnosed with severe depression.
In the video, according to the "Notice of Appraisal Opinion of the Nanning Qingxiu Public Security Bureau" provided by Ms. Jiang, the comparison results of the samples taken from the clothes worn at the time of the rape incident showed that the DNA contained was the same as the 38 Y-chromosome loci contained in Dai's blood sample, and it was not ruled out that it came from the same paternal line!
On December 30, the Nanning police publicly responded to the matter, saying: After review, our bureau has filed a case for investigation, and the case is under investigation.
As soon as the online rights protection video of the woman surnamed Jiang was released, it immediately attracted widespread attention from the society!
In recent years, with the rapid development of the Internet, online rights protection videos are also common.
I can't help but ask: why do people like to defend their rights online?
Why can we really solve the problem only by making the matter known to everyone and causing public opinion pressure?
Is it helpless or sad for people to use online public opinion to defend their rights?