This is a lawsuit that spans more than a year. In 2020, Mr. Chen discovered that none of his three children were biological, and his wife Yu had been fornicating with others for a long time. However, just recently, there has been an even more shocking scene in this case that corrupted many people
Yu not only denied cheating, but also asked for the division of the property. This new demand instantly caused an uproar on the Internet, and the public discussed it, denouncing her for moral degradation and demanding severe punishment in accordance with the law.
In fact, this is not her first line of defense. In the previous trial, Yu denied the authenticity of the DNA test report across the board. She claimed that the test was funded by the man, Mr. Chan, and the report was not credible.
This argument has been challenged by the courts and the public. Mr. Chan retorted that a third-party organization was involved in the entire testing process and there was no possibility of fraud. Moreover, DNA testing is one of the evidence in serious criminal cases, and if the test results are fabricated, he will also bear legal responsibility.
"I don't think normal people would do such a thing, right?" A netizen commented, "This is not a glorious thing, who else would burden themselves to fake?"
The public generally believes that the DNA test report is scientific and impartial, and its results are highly credible. Yu's rebuttal is fragile and weak, and he is just passing the buck.
In the second line of defense, Yu denied the necessity of returning child support. She insisted that the child had been fostered in her mother's home since birth, and that there was no fact that the man had financed her upbringing.
This claim has also been questioned. Mr. Chen had produced bank statements of the money he had given to Yu over the years, but the woman had no evidence to support her claim. "Then why didn't she explain what Mr. Chen had done with the money that Mr. Chen had given her over the years?" A netizen asked, "Can't she say that she didn't raise it, right?"
The third line of defense, Yu asked for the division of the property of the joint property of the two. and claimed that she had invested in the purchase money. However, she was unable to produce any proof of contribution. The woman said that she had contributed to the construction of the house and the land, but did not show evidence of the contribution. Netizens have pointed out this logical loophole.
In fact, according to the evidence provided by Mr. Chen's sister, the land was donated by his family. This time, Yu's request for the division of real estate is also untenable. In the course of the trial, Yu repeatedly showed a tendency to prevaricate, quibble, and deceive. She does not admit to the breakdown of the relationship, does not admit to filing for divorce many times, and does not even admit the iron-clad fact of cheating and having children.
For a time, everyone sighed "three songs and four up". Netizens were heartbroken and denounced her for losing her moral bottom line. A mother who can't keep her husband's trust, can't protect her children's happiness, and even disregards the bottom line of ethics and wantonly corrupts other people's families.
Whatever the affair between them, it is an indisputable fact that she betrayed her family and had four children with him. One commenter wrote. It is true that feelings can have twists and turns, but ethics have a bottom line. Her betrayal of her family is unacceptable to her heart and reason.
This case involves a wide range of people and has a huge impact. It not only touches the interests of the parties, but also concerns social moral judgment. Countless netizens here are paying attention to the fact that the final judgment of the case will have a far-reaching impact on social ethics.
"What a crisis of confidence it would have if the bad guys had won. Netizens warned. This is exactly what people are worried about. If the law is not strict and the people are not respectful, then what can become our moral line of defense?
Regardless of the punishment that the perpetrators will eventually pay for this perfidy, we look forward to both legal and moral sanctions. Reality is beautiful after all, and time will surely heal the injustice in our hearts. Let us watch the follow-up together, and also watch the righteous voices that guard ethics.
#文章首发挑战赛#