Before reading this article, please click "Follow", the content of the article is from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete, and you can point out the shortcomings in the comment area, thank you for your advice and support
Lead:
A divorce case shocked the whole society, sparking curiosity and controversy among the public. The man's demand for the return of child support has aroused the suspicion of the court, and what is even more surprising is that the woman, Yu, has given birth to four children with others, and denied cheating, insisting that the children are Mr. Chen's biological flesh and blood. This case not only involves the division of marital property, but also involves a man's crisis of trust. Let's walk into this divorce case together and see how the final verdict will affect our values.
Who is the father of the child
In this seemingly ordinary divorce case, the man, Mr. Chen, made an important demand - the return of child support. However, the woman, Yu, and the third party did not attend the trial, and only submitted a simple statement of defense. The atmosphere at the trial scene seemed a little cold, and they all cast puzzled eyes.
The judge cleared his throat and said, "Mr. Chen, you have filed a request for the return of child support, please explain the reasons in detail." ”
Mr. Chen stood up, stared at the woman's defense, and then said firmly: "I have reason to believe that I am not the biological father of the children. ”
For a moment, the entire court fell silent, and it was impossible to imagine that such a claim would become the focus of a divorce case.
Falsified allegations
Mr. Chen's words threw a boulder into a pond and stirred up a ripple. The woman, Yu, was embarrassed, and suddenly got up to speak: "Mr. Chen deliberately framed me for cheating just to avoid paying child support, and claimed that the child was not his own. ”
The woman's words aroused Mr. Chen's anger, and he immediately retorted: "I have never bribed any testing agency, let alone faked." If I am breaking the law, why am I willing to accept the request to redo the paternity test?"
The atmosphere in the courtroom was solemn and uneasy, and everyone wondered why the woman suddenly made such an accusation and whether she had concealed it.
Custody of deviant responsibilities
Mr. Chen recalls his life over the years and touches the softest place in his heart - children. He angrily asked the woman: "Why have the children been raised in your house? You are unwilling to return the child support, don't you need to explain where all the money I have given you over the years has gone?"
Mr. Chen's voice was full of grief and indignation, and the air in the courtroom seemed to freeze. The woman, Yu, insisted that she had been trying her best to raise the child, but she could not explain on the spot the whereabouts of the child support paid by Mr. Chen over the years, and neither the transfer nor other forms of evidence appeared.
In full view, the woman's defense appeared fragile and untenable.
Struggle for common property
The focus of the debate gradually shifted to the battle for the joint property of the spouses. Yu claimed that she contributed to the purchase of the house and land, but was unable to provide any evidence of her contribution.
Just when the woman was in trouble, Mr. Chen's sister was ready to present evidence. She handed the judge a stack of papers, representing documents proving the origin of the land, for good and specific reasons. "These are all gifts that I gave to Mr. Chan as a testimony to the family affection between us. My sister said calmly.
The atmosphere in the court seemed to be hit by electricity, and the woman fell into passivity again.
Struggle and justification
Yu suddenly brought up the situation that he had filed for divorce many times, but was rejected by Mr. Chen, trying to explain that Mr. Chen wanted to give the child a complete family, believing that the relationship between the two still existed. Whether such a statement can be accepted by the court is unknown. However, in the eyes of everyone, this explanation pales in comparison, and even makes people feel a little ridiculous.
The woman tried to explain her position, but her words sounded like a shirking of responsibility and covering up the truth. Faced with such a situation, Mr. Chen was speechless, and his heart was full of disappointment and grief.
Crisis of confidence
The matter has been fermenting on the Internet for more than a year, and every response from the woman seems weak and embarrassing. She couldn't face the truth in front of everyone, and she even seemed so powerless to justify. This raises the question: how important is trust in a marriage relationship?
In this divorce case, no matter what the relationship between the husband and wife was, it is an indisputable fact that the woman betrayed the family and had four children with him. When people saw that her response was unconvincing, their trust in her plummeted.
The judgment in court is about to be released, whether it is the man or the woman, whether it is the return of alimony or other judgments, which will have a profound impact on the future of life. But whatever the outcome, people are looking forward to a just, fair verdict that will bring the matter to a successful conclusion.
The final verdict will reshape people's perception of marriage and the evaluation of infidelity. If the verdict is in favour of the man, it will help to maintain the trust in the marriage, and if the verdict is not satisfactory, it will trigger a deeper moral reflection and a crisis of confidence. In any case, this case will become an important social event with far-reaching consequences.
The above content is from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.