laitimes

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

author:A source of inspiration
"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

Once upon a time, the TV series "Flowers" made countless audiences fall in love with its exquisite costumes and a highly restored sense of age. However, as the plot deepened, word-of-mouth showed a plummeting trend. Many viewers have said that the acting skills of the second female lead have become the hard wound of the whole drama, and she has dragged down the level of the whole drama by herself.

So, what's going on here? Today, let's explore this question.

First, the exquisite costume and the restoration of the sense of age

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

Since the launch of "Flowers", its exquisite costumes and highly restored sense of age have become a hot topic among the audience. The sets, costumes, and props in the play all show a very high level of production, making the audience feel as if they have traveled to that era and feel the style of that era.

Second, the acting skills of the second female lead were questioned

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

However, just when the audience was full of praise for the service of "Flowers", the acting skills of the second female lead became the target of public criticism. Many viewers believe that the performance of the second female lead is too blunt and lacks a sense of emotional layering, which is far from the acting skills of other actors in the play. What's more, some viewers said that the acting skills of the second female lead are simply to the point of making people play, completely destroying the look and feel of the whole show.

3. The female No. 2 dragged down the whole drama by herself?

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

As the voices questioning the acting skills of the female number two became louder and louder, more and more audiences began to think that it was precisely because of the poor performance of the female number two that the reputation of the whole show plummeted. What's more, some radical viewers even said that the female number two single-handedly dragged down the level of the whole show.

So, is this really the case? Is the acting skills of the second female really so bad that it affects the level of the whole show?

Fourth, look at the problem comprehensively and objectively

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

In fact, we need to look at this issue comprehensively and objectively. Although there are indeed some problems with the acting skills of the second female lead, it is obviously unfair to blame her alone for the level of the whole drama. The success of a drama depends not only on the performance of the actors, but also on many factors such as the plot, director, and screenwriter.

Fifth, the rhythm of the plot is not properly controlled

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

In fact, "Flowers" has certain problems in the control of the rhythm of the plot. Some plots are too protracted and lack a sense of compactness, causing viewers to easily lose patience during the viewing process. And some plots are oversimplified, lacking depth and connotation, making it difficult for the audience to deeply understand the emotions and inner world of the characters in the play.

Sixth, the coordination between the director and the screenwriter is insufficient

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

In addition, "Flowers" also has certain problems in the coordination between the director and the screenwriter. Sometimes, there is a big difference between the director's understanding of the plot and the screenwriter's, resulting in a shooting effect that is far from the screenwriter's original intention. In this way, it will not only affect the coherence and depth of the plot, but also affect the audience's evaluation of the whole drama.

7. Insufficient chemistry between actors

"Flowers": Word of mouth plummeted, the second female acting skills were too poor, and she dragged down the whole drama by herself?

Of course, we can't ignore the chemistry between the actors. In "Flowers", the tacit understanding between some actors is obviously insufficient, causing them to appear a little stiff and awkward when filming rival scenes. Such a performance will not only affect the presentation of the plot, but also greatly reduce the audience's perception of the whole show.

There are many reasons for the plummeting reputation of "Flowers", and it cannot be simply attributed to the poor acting skills of the second female lead. As an audience, we should look at the problem comprehensively and objectively, and evaluate the quality of a drama from multiple perspectives. At the same time, we also hope that the producers can seriously summarize the lessons learned and continue to improve and improve in future works. Only in this way can we produce more excellent TV drama works to meet the expectations and needs of the audience.