关注我，大逗每天都分享各类型观点趣事，希望得到大家的喜欢与支持。 码字不易，希望可以点亮红心给个赞
Here's the thing
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
Angle 1: The contest between privacy and commercial interests
In this era of information explosion, our social accounts have long been more than a simple way to contact us, but an important carrier of our personal privacy, emotions and social relationships. However, from the company's point of view, employees use this WeChat account to connect with customers, and these customer resources are undoubtedly the company's wealth.
Angle 2: The entanglement between workplace ethics and interpersonal relationships
In this case, the colleague insisted that it was her personal account, and also said that there were not only work contacts but also relatives and friends in the WeChat account. In the workplace, should we completely separate ourselves from work? Should we completely cut ties with former colleagues when we leave the company? How should this entanglement of workplace ethics and interpersonal relationships be resolved?
Angle 3: The contradiction between the legal system and the actual operation
From a legal point of view, employees' personal information and social media accounts should be protected, and companies have no right to require employees to hand over their personal accounts. However, in real life, many companies will require employees to use the social media accounts provided by the company to communicate with each other when recruiting employees, in this case, have employees acquiesced to this arrangement? When employees leave the company, does the company have the right to require employees to hand over their personal accounts? How should this contradiction between the legal system and the actual operation be reconciled?
Summary: Behind this seemingly simple resignation dispute, there are actually many issues such as privacy, workplace ethics, and the legal system. We should fully consider the interests of the company and seek a balanced solution while protecting the rights and interests of employees.