laitimes

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

author:Roam a world of wonders

#文章首发挑战赛#

In other words, ancient buildings are an important carrier of cultural inheritance, but after years of erosion, the original buildings may be destroyed or disappear for various reasons...

However, through reconstruction, these important historical and cultural symbols have been continued and displayed, which is inevitable in all dynasties, such as the following:

Zhaozhou Bridge

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Zhaozhou Bridge was overhauled in the 50s of the last century, said to be repaired, in fact, it was demolished and rebuilt, 87% of the stone was replaced, many of the old stones that could be used were also abandoned and reinforced concrete, and the Guandi Temple next to it was also demolished.

Although it looks similar to the original, it is difficult to say that it is a thousand-year-old bridge, and the floor of the newly built park on the side is integrated, and the ticket is 40 Do you think it is worth it...

Qingdao Railway Station

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Qingdao Station was built in the 26th year of Guangxu in the Qing Dynasty (1900), demolished and rebuilt in 1991, and part of it was rebuilt by 1.5 times magnified as it was, but the details cannot be compared with the old building.

Jinan Railway Station

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

In a similar case, the only Gothic railway station in the Far East, once the largest railway station in Asia, was demolished and rebuilt in 1992. On the one hand, it was indeed overwhelmed back then, and on the other hand, the local leaders felt that "the old railway station was a colonial building" and that "the towering green roof (the top of the bell tower) was like a helmet of the German army"...

And now, it has begun to shout for reconstruction, some people express their approval, which can evoke the memory of a generation of Jinan people, and some people think that this is "stupid and stupid".

Lanzhou grips the bridge

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

There are eight scenic spots in Lanzhou in the old days, one of which is to hold the bridge "Hongqiao Spring Rise", there is no pillar in the river, and it is not afraid of the trouble of water rushing. In 1952, it was demolished due to urban construction.

The current grip bridge, located in the Lanzhou Waterwheel Expo Park, is actually not even rebuilt, it is an imitation...

Fuzhou Zhenhai Building

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

The tallest building in the ancient city of Fuzhou, one of the nine famous buildings in China, was destroyed by fire in 1933, was transformed into a bunker in the "Fujian Incident", was rebuilt into a memorial hall in 1946, and was demolished again in the sixties and seventies.

In 2008, she was rebuilt according to the original style of Zhenhai Building in the Ming Dynasty, and the foundation of the building was made of modern building materials and technology, ending the history of Zhenhai Building in Fuzhou.

Beijing Yongding Gate

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Founded in the 32nd year of Jiajing in the Ming Dynasty (1553), in 1957, in order to adapt to the development of the city, the city tower, the arrow tower was demolished one after another, and became the south second ring road with heavy traffic, "Yongding Gate" is just the place name.

In 2000, experts proposed to rebuild, and in 2004 the reconstruction was completed, but only the city tower was rebuilt, and the arrow tower and the urn city were not rebuilt.

Nanjing Yifeng Gate

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

In 1931, Yifeng Gate was renamed Xingzhong Gate, implying the will to revitalize China.

In the demolition campaign that swept the country in 1958-1959, the Yifeng Gate was demolished, but the walls on both sides were well preserved. In 2006, the Yifeng Gate was rebuilt, and the city walls on both sides were also reconnected, but for the convenience of transportation, it was designed as a three-hole city gate.

Zhengding Longxing Temple Great Compassion Pavilion

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

This building, which began in the Northern Song Dynasty, contains a 24-meter-high statue of Guanyin with a thousand hands, which has undergone a process of being destroyed, rebuilt, demolished, rebuilt, demolished again, and rebuilt again over the past century.

Demolished and built, built and demolished, the Great Compassion Pavilion seems to be getting more and more luxurious, but it can only be regarded as an antique building.

Confucius temple

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

The picture above from left to right is: Juxing Pavilion, Tianxia Shu Archway, Pan Palace Archway, Daoguan Ancient and Modern Archway, Kuiguang Pavilion. The Juxing Pavilion was destroyed in the 1960s, and the others were destroyed during the Anti-Japanese War.

Juxing Pavilion, Kuiguang Pavilion and Tianxia Pivot Arch were rebuilt in the early 1980s, all of which were new buildings, while the Pangong Archway and Daoguan Ancient and Modern Archway have long been destroyed and have not been rebuilt so far.

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Confucius Temple Dazhaobi, is the most photographic wall in China, has the "first wall in the world" said, was destroyed in the War of Resistance Against Japan, but at that time in more than 100 years there is no "double dragon play pearl" that will shine at night.

Golden Horse Biji Fang

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

This archway, which began in the Ming Dynasty and is one of the landmarks of Kunming, was destroyed in the 1960s for well-known reasons.

Originally rebuilt in 1884 in this old wooden photograph, it has existed for less than 100 years, while the existing "Golden Horse Biji Fang" was rebuilt in the original style on the original site in 1998.

Dabao'en Temple glazed pagoda

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

In the Ming and Qing dynasties, the glazed pagoda of Dabao'en Temple was called "the first tower in the world", and it was also one of the seven wonders of the ancient world, which was destroyed during the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom.

I can't say it's exactly the same, but it's irrelevant... This style of painting,Is it the cyber residence of the electronic bodhisattva?,At first glance, I thought I had traveled to 2077.,Far ahead...

Jiaxing three towers

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Jiaxing three towers began in the Tang Dynasty, one of the symbols of the Grand Canal, the purpose is to "town river", was demolished in the 70s of the last century, a cement factory was built on the original site, named "three towers", part of the tower bricks are used to repair the People's Square.

At the beginning of this century, the economy became better, and the pursuit of "culture" began again, so the cement factory was demolished and the three towers were rebuilt.

Tiananmen

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

The Tiananmen Square we see today was not built during the Ming and Qing dynasties, but was rebuilt in 1969. In fact, only one palace (Qin'an Palace) in the current Forbidden City was left from the place where it was built in 600.

Because the wooden structure has been sinking for a long time, although the appearance does not seem to have changed much after reconstruction, the height is 83 cm higher, the size of the bucket arch part is increased, and the eaves angle is more warped. PS: It is said that 7 shells were dug up during the demolition ...

Yellow crane tower

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

In the past, people have taken the Yellow Crane to go, the Yellow Crane Tower is vacant here, no matter how many times the Yellow Crane Tower has been rebuilt, just the poem is there, the Yellow Crane Tower is in the ......

The current Yellow Crane Tower was rebuilt in 1985 and is based on the 1868 Tongzhi Tower, which only existed for 14 years before it was destroyed by fire. The biggest difference between the current Yellow Crane Tower is that it has two more floors than the original, and it is not the original site, because the Yangtze River Bridge was built on the original site.

Tengwang Pavilion

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

In the fourth year of Tang Yonghui (653), Li Yuanying, the king of Teng, served as the governor of Hongzhou in the south of the Yangtze River, and built a pavilion in Hongzhou named "Tengwang Pavilion". In the following 1,300 years, the Tengwang Pavilion was rebuilt about 29 times, and the Qing Dynasty alone rebuilt 10 times...

The 28th reconstruction, in 1909, was very small and had only two floors, and the courtyard wall was half as high as it was... What we are seeing now is the reconstruction of this Song-style pavilion in 1985 according to Li Mingzhong's "Construction of the French Style" (this book is equivalent to the current building code) of the Song Dynasty.

Leifeng Tower

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

Leifeng Pagoda has been rebuilt a total of 3 times in history, the most recent one is 2000, and the history may not be as long as your ancestral home...

The old picture shows the remnants of the tower that did not collapse in the 1920s, and the wooden structure on the outer part has disappeared, leaving only the inner center of the tower, so it looks very different from the current one.

Comparison of famous ancient buildings "before reconstruction vs after reconstruction", can it still be regarded as a place of interest?

It is not surprising that almost all of the reconstructed antique buildings in Japan are rebuilt, but after a few years, they can be considered monuments...

#看见人间百态#

Read on