laitimes

Why did the Warriors give up Thompson's second-in-command?

author:Xiao Zhang Sports Club

In the Warriors, Curry is the undisputed leader, and Thompson has been his right-hand man. Recently, however, the Warriors have made a series of changes, including the removal of Wiggins to the bench. The move sparked speculation among fans, with some believing it was an attempt to boost Thompson's trade value, while others believed it was due to coach Kerr's nostalgia for him.

Why did the Warriors give up Thompson's second-in-command?

Looking back at the Warriors' four championships, we can see that Thompson was barely a second-leading player in just one of those games, and that he was just a major role player the rest of the time. This has caused the Warriors to waver about his contract extension. Although Thompson was involved in winning the championship as a three-in-command, given the precedent in NBA history, it is rare for a three-in-command to hold this role for a long time on a team.

The Warriors need to remain competitive and flexible, and in modern basketball, there are many factors that must be considered when building a team, such as salary constraints, team chemistry, and more. While Thompson is an excellent shooter and one of the team's core members, the future will require the Warriors to make some tough decisions.

Why did the Warriors give up Thompson's second-in-command?

So it's no surprise that the Warriors have given up Thompson's second-place position. Such adjustments will help improve the team's overall strength and competitiveness, and pave the way for the Warriors to go on a basketball journey in the future.

To sum up, the Warriors made this decision not to belittle Thompson's ability, but to consider the long-term development of the team. Over time, we'll see how the Warriors use this adjustment to continue to write a brilliant page for their basketball dynasty.

Why did the Warriors give up Thompson's second-in-command?

Read on