# **Academician Zhong Nanshan's live broadcast brought the goods?Netizen criticism is not a smear behavior!**
### Description:
Recently, it is rumored that Academician Zhong Nanshan, a well-known expert on respiratory infectious diseases in China, participated in the live broadcast of the event, which has aroused widespread attention and discussion. However, it should be clear that the criticism made by netizens is not a smear against him, but a concern and question about the participation of scientists in commercial activities.
### Body:
In recent years, live streaming has become a popular trend, and many celebrities and influencers have joined the industry to sell goods and earn huge profits through live streaming. However, it has recently been rumored that Academician Zhong Nanshan has also joined the ranks, and the live broadcast has aroused heated public opinion for a while.
As a leader in China's fight against the COVID-19 epidemic, Academician Zhong Nanshan has won the respect and admiration of the people of the whole country with his profound academic attainments and rich clinical experience. His initiatives and science popularization work during the pandemic have undoubtedly played an important role and become an inspirational icon.
However, when rumors appeared about Academician Zhong Nanshan's participation in the live broadcast, some netizens began to express doubts about his move. They believe that as a scientist and public figure, Academician Zhong Nanshan should maintain academic and moral purity, and should not link his reputation and image with commercial interests. They are worried that this kind of business practice may have a negative impact on Academician Zhong's professional image and credibility.
However, it should be clear that the criticism from netizens is not a smear against Academician Zhong Nanshan personally, but a concern about the commercialization of the roles of scientists and public figures. In an era of information explosion, where the public is susceptible to advertising and marketing strategies, scientists should be more cautious and avoid being swayed by commercial interests.
It is important for public figures to maintain their credibility and academic reputation. While live streaming can bring them huge financial returns, it also requires weighing the risks and pros and cons. It is important to be clear that the mission of scientists is to contribute to society and disseminate authentic and effective knowledge, not to be a tool for commercial sales.
In this age of rumors and disinformation, the public expects more from scientists. They hope that scientists can adhere to professional ethics, have the courage to take responsibility, and make more contributions to society. Therefore, netizens' criticism of Academician Zhong Nanshan's participation in the live broadcast is also an expectation and reminder of the role of scientists.
### Conclusion:
As public figures, especially scientists, we should recognize the importance of our social responsibility and image building. While live streaming can bring financial benefits, we can't ignore the risks and consequences that may exist.
The criticism from netizens is not a smear, but a question about the commercialization of the role of scientists. We should encourage scientists to uphold professional ethics, maintain academic purity, and make real contributions to society.
*(END)*