Since Lao Hu learned to speculate in stocks, the "content" of his words has become higher and higher.
In the face of some experts' "Correct Name", he retorted in a high-profile manner: There is no point!
Fortunately, Lao Hu's words were so mild that his post is still there.
But another expert who had fought with him was not so lucky.
In September 2023, Hu Xijin talked eloquently in a live broadcast: "Who wants to cut my leeks, how can you cut me if I don't sell them?"
The expert next to him tilted his mouth and leaned back, giving a contemptuous expression, and desperately holding back a smile.
(Netizens' deduction does not represent the true thoughts of the parties)
Later, the expert and a financial reporter said in the live broadcast: "Lao Hu is very pure...... He actually said, "If I don't sell them, how can they cut me?"
As soon as the words fell, the two clapped their hands and laughed.
Later, the expert's thinking continued to fly, and he said something "related to the capital market" in some public places..... It's not perfect, and now is not a good time to speculate on stocks."
On December 7, the expert was banned from the Internet.
According to public information:
Liu Jipeng, 67 this year, was the dean of the Capital and Finance Research Institute of China University of Political Science and Law, the chief expert of major projects of the National Social Science Fund, and was a member of the drafting group of the "Securities Law", "Securities Investment Fund Law" and "Futures Trading Law", and presided over the design of more than 270 enterprises' share reform and listing, corporate strategy, mergers and acquisitions and investment plans.
But on Christmas Eve yesterday, the expert said in the circle of friends that he was no longer a dean.
Perhaps, this is a normal retirement.
After all, people are old, their opinions conflict with Lao Hu, they don't have a sense of proportion, and their expressions are poorly managed, so they are indeed no longer suitable for the reputation of "experts".
And his banner has also been carried by Lao Hu.
There are many well-known financial influencers in the West, such as Hayek, Keynes, Friedman, Stiglitz, etc.
Although they have different views, they still have one thing in common: studying economics and devoting their lives to the study of economics.
And our biggest financial big V now is Lao Hu.
500,000 account opening, small and broad, speaking of the stock market, it is called a head is the way, and the views are sharp.
After half a year, Lao Hu currently said that he has lost more than 10%, that is, more than 50,000 yuan.
Of course, this is not worth mentioning compared to his sky-high traffic income.
Liu Jipeng said that Lao Hu is "speculative stock speculation" - others speculate on stocks, and he speculates on stocks.
This point is quite transparent.
After all, Lao Hu's major is not only economics, but also includes Russia-Ukraine relations, Sino-US relations, entertainment gossip, social history and other fields.
Abbreviation: Whatever is hot, he specializes in it.
I thought about it for a while, if Chinese investors follow the investment of experts and follow the investment of Lao Hu, it should be a little painful in the past six months.
After all, the opinions given by our top institutions and top experts are often quite different from reality.
Their popularity, their income level, and the accuracy of their forecasts are often not proportional.
This also caused a question for many people:
Why is it that a person who predicts completely wrong can always predict without legal and moral responsibility?
Legally, forecasts are not responsible.
After all, it's just a prediction.
It's just that the person who spoke blushed a little afterwards, and at the same time he will be coldly looked at and ridiculed by the masses.
But here's the problem.
Why do some people suddenly fail to make predictions when they are so good?
And even if some people are wrong in their predictions, they can still have such a loud voice, and there are more and more fans.
Is this a kind of bad money driving out good money?
Isn't conscience condemned?
The Magi is nameless, the slanderer is high, the chicken and the dog are barking, this era is slightly magical.
-Finish-
Enthusiastic likes, passionate attention, affectionate stars