What are the differences between the different ZEISS styles of the vivo X100? Just look at these samples
If you have used the vivo X series products launched in recent years, I believe you must know that the X series has not only received the blessing of Zeiss technology in terms of imaging hardware, but also incorporated a large number of Zeiss elements in the algorithm, such as the different Zeiss styles in the camera portrait mode have been loved by many people. In the latest vivo X100 series, a new member of the Zeiss style has been added - B-speed, a total of 7 Zeiss styles can be selected, so what are the differences between these Zeiss styles?
In fact, in the ZEISS style selection interface of the vivo X100 series, we can intuitively see the differences between these styles, the most obvious is the different shapes of the light spots, and there are also certain differences in the bokeh intensity between different styles.
First of all, let's take a look at the new B-Speed style sample, which simulates the effect of the ZEISS B-Speed series of cinema lenses, and you can see that the light spot in the background takes on a triangular shape, which is very rare in the mobile phone market, and the bokeh effect is moderately strong. The launch of the B-Speed style not only brings a new light spot effect, but also has great characteristics and personality, and it can be said that everyone can almost certainly see such a triangular light spot as soon as they see the work of the vivo X100 series. The B-Speed style is suitable for a wide range of scenes, with wide-angle scenes with a sense of narrative, and telephoto scenes that can make the subject stand out better.
The following is a sample of Sonnar style, with a moderate bokeh effect and a creamy flare effect, and the overall picture effect looks relatively soft, which I personally think is suitable for use in scenes with open backgrounds such as the seaside and grasslands.
The classic Biotar style needs no introduction, and it has been loved by many people since it appeared on the vivo X series products, with a unique oval rotating light spot effect with distinctive characteristics and great personality. When the background light is more and more scattered, the Biotar-style effect will definitely satisfy you.
The Planar style focuses on the dream spot effect, the background light source will show a relatively large elliptical light spot, and the bokeh in the non-light source area is relatively strong, and some detailed areas can no longer even see the outline before the bokeh. The Planar style is more suitable for use in telephoto scenes, and at the same time, the details of the subject can be better presented and highlighted while embellishing the image with dream light spots.
The Distagon-style flare has a hexagonal look, the background blur effect is moderately weak, the outline of the non-light area is basically preserved, and the overall look is relatively natural, which is suitable for use in wide-angle scenes.
The Cine-flare style is added to the vivo X90 series, which can bring a solar flare-like effect when the background is a strong and single point light source, and an arc effect when there are many background lights. It can be seen that the bokeh effect of this style is relatively strong, and the background light spot is naturally round, which together with the light arc plays a role in setting off the main body of the picture.
There's also a cinematic style, which allows you to change the photo ratio to a classic 2.39:1 cinematic aspect ratio, with an elliptical flare and a cinematic blue line flare when the capture light source switch is turned on. Since this style is special, it will not be compared with other styles. It is worth mentioning that the vivo X100 series also adds a portrait lens package, which directly combines the Zeiss style with the filter, and the user can switch it with one click, and the practicality is also quite strong.
After reading the above samples, will you choose the Zeiss style now?