Four security guards of the property were drunk late at night and came to collect fees, which led to a conflict with the owner, but in the end, the owner was released on bail pending trial on suspicion of intentional injury, while the property personnel were only administratively detained and fined.
The outcome of this treatment has raised many questions, what exactly led to such a verdict?
Where is the fairness of the law?
The event passed
On December 7, a property owner, Mr. Sun, posted a video to break the news that four property personnel were drunk late at night and came to collect fees.
One of the property staff started swearing and demanded that the payment must be made that night.
When she heard the conflict, she hurried out of the room and saw the security guard holding a rubber baton in his hand.
"I went to pull the fight, and their security guards started beating me up as well. The owner's wife said that her daughter came to take a video with her mobile phone, but they also beat her.
During the conflict, the owner's daughter's left ring finger and little finger tendons were broken.
However, the final verdict was puzzling, the owner was released on bail on suspicion of intentional injury, while the property staff only faced administrative detention and fines.
The owner said: If your wife and children are beaten, can you watch it like this?
Is injury the only criterion?
The verdict was mostly based on the assessment of the injuries of both parties, and Mr. Sun's daughter's hand tendon was broken, which was a minor injury, while the security guard's nose bone injury constituted a minor injury.
Photos of the owner's daughter injured
Although there are clear criteria in the law for distinguishing between minor and serious injuries, the question is whether liability should be determined solely on the basis of injuries.
Photo of his wife's injuries
Shouldn't we consider more fully what happened, what was going on, what was going on, and what was done in a more holistic way?
Where is the fairness of the law?
Mr. Sun said in the video that the property staff brought rubber sticks to the door late at night, which was obviously a bad visitor.
In this case, should the owner's counterattack be considered self-defense?
Does the fairness of the law lie in the determination of responsibility based on right and wrong, or only in terms of the severity of the injury?
Society expects the law to be just and reasonable, and the outcome of this incident seems to be puzzling.
The voice of society: a call for just judgment
This dispute between the property and the owner has aroused widespread concern and doubts in the society.
For such a punishment, netizens ran to the Suzhou police account to comment.
"I heard that in Suzhou, you don't need to judge"
"How to apply for Suzhou property, it doesn't matter if you make money or not, you mainly want to wander around people's homes"
A netizen asked what conditions are needed to go to Suzhou Community as a property, and someone later replied "I will pick my hand, and it is enough to pay 1,000 yuan"
These are all netizens' dissatisfaction with the penalty. If your wife and children are beaten, you won't fight back?
Both parties were responsible, the wife was beaten, the children were also picked, and the security guard only paid 1,000 yuan and was detained for 15 days.
However, the owner was suspected of intentional injury and was released on bail pending trial for one year.
To be honest, I don't understand such a verdict.
【Disclaimer】The process and pictures described in the article are all from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If you are involved in copyright or character infringement, please contact us in time.