#时事热点头条说#
Today is the media open day of the Chinese Basketball Association and the CBA, and it is also a special policy set up by the Basketball Association and the CBA company this season, which is to use such a time to answer some relevant questions that the media is more concerned about, especially the questions that some fans are more concerned about. The chairman of the CBA, Yao Ming, the chairman of the Basketball Association, Xu Jicheng and others also came to the scene and explained them one by one as the main guests who answered the questions.
In this media open day, everyone is more concerned about the issue of referees, because everyone has always felt that the level of CBA is low, and the level of Chinese basketball is also very low, but the level of referees in CBA is even lower, and many fans, including the media, believe that the low level of referees in CBA has affected the development of Chinese basketball. As a result, we are not suitable for high-level penalties when we are on the international stage under such a low level of punishment. Judging from Yao Ming's response today, it can almost be said that the Basketball Association unconditionally supports the referee, and even in Yao Ming's eyes, Bao does not think that the level of our CBA referees is very low.
When a reporter asked Yao Ming, why our referees make so many wrong decisions in every game, is it because their professional level is not good? This should be a very sharp question, but Yao Ming's answer reflects his maintenance of referees. Yao Ming said: Many referees' decisions are made in an instant, he needs to follow his feelings, follow his intuition, this intuition is sometimes right, sometimes wrong, you can't guarantee that he is right every time.
Yao Ming attributed all the misjudgments of the CBA to intuition, believing that such an answer can neither satisfy the media on the scene, nor the referee, nor the fans, after all, it is very irresponsible to attribute all the mistakes to intuition, if our CBA referees rely on intuition to make instant judgments, rather than relying on his years of experience and ability to make judgments, then what is the significance of our training of these CBA referees?
We can do a referee exam, list all the basketball rules, and as long as the test is a perfect score in theory, you can go to the CBA game. Anyway, I already understand the rules, and then I go up to enforce the law, as for whether the judgment is right or wrong, it doesn't matter, because I don't rely on experience, not ability, not my observation, but intuition, I think this ball is a good ball, that's a good ball, I think this ball is a foul, that's a foul, how can we explain it?
It can be said that the CBA company is going further and further on the road of maintaining referees. Last season, the CBA had a fairly fair policy. The referee report of the game can be issued within three points, and the referee report can clearly understand what correct penalties the CBA referee made and which wrong penalties in this game, which has a certain incentive and spur effect on the CBA referees, which will force them to be more accurate when making penalties and improve their professional level, because the referee is also afraid of being exposed and becoming the focus of media discussion.
But this year this policy was abolished. It can be said that our current CBA referees are completely living in a greenhouse. There is no pressure from the outside world at all, they say what they say on the pitch and there is no room for questioning. Now there are doubts from the outside world, and our basketball association executives have stood up for them. In such a completely warm and stress-free environment, how can they self-motivate and improve themselves?