I am You, welcome to click [Follow] above, life bits and pieces, new things, social hot spots, daily offering
Recently, the city of Incheon, South Korea, announced an eye-catching policy - a subsidy of 100 million won (about 550,000 yuan) for each newborn. This move immediately aroused the attention and heated discussions of the majority of netizens, and many people were envious of it.
However, this policy is not without controversy. Some netizens said that although the policy seems attractive, in fact, for ordinary families, the cost of childbirth is far more than that. In addition, the high cost of childcare has also made many families reluctant to have children. Therefore, the practical effect of this policy remains to be seen.
Some netizens said that if China learn Xi s from South Korea's policy and uses real money to stimulate fertility, the fertility rate will definitely go up, but why is there no such policy in China, because each country's economic, social and cultural background is different. South Korea implements policies that may be in line with its country's specific circumstances, but they do not necessarily apply to China.
550,000 words, I believe that there are still many people who are willing to give birth, the first is the remote areas such as townships and counties, rural areas, etc., this direct cash subsidy method is the most able to stimulate the people's fertility.
China's population is huge and faces different social, economic, and political challenges. Therefore, China needs to formulate its own fertility policies according to its own conditions, rather than simply copying the practices of other countries. This means that China's demographics, social security system, economic development level and many other factors need to be taken into account, rather than simply increasing the birth allowance.
China's aging population is the trend, its own pension is enough, if a large wave to subsidize childbirth, the domestic economic pressure will be unimaginable, not conducive to social development.
If it is really subsidized, or that sentence, the wool is out of the sheep, where does this money come from, I believe you all have the knowledge in your heart, the sum of the money is only so much, once the balance is broken, it will cause a series of reactions, so we will not learn from the policy subsidies like South Korea Xi
Of course, there are still many optimistic people who believe that if it is in South Korea at the moment, then this policy can stimulate fertility to a great extent, after all, South Korea's population itself is at the bottom, and the fertility rate is even lower and scary.
South Korea's 550,000 may be enough to raise a baby to adulthood, but in China, some people have preliminarily calculated: including the cost of infant upbringing, education, wedding bride price, wedding house purchase, etc., the sum is generally about millions, and the 550,000 is obviously not enough.
In addition, the implementation of policies needs to take into account long-term effectiveness and sustainability. South Korea's birth subsidy policy may stimulate fertility in the short term, but it may create other problems in the long term. Therefore, China needs to take a holistic approach to its fertility policy, rather than simply following the practices of other countries.
Although this policy of Incheon City has aroused widespread attention and heated discussions, its actual effect remains to be seen. In any case, we expect more effective measures to increase fertility rates at home and lay a solid foundation for future social and economic development.
What do you think of this policy of South Korea, let's see you in the comment area
Thank you for watching, tell me what you think, see you in the comment area!